Brad Wardell's Blog


UN: Oil for food program funded the UN

Published on Sunday, April 25, 2004 By Brad Wardell In Politics

Saw this at www.instapundit.com regarding an article in Today's Telegraph (UK), hardly a bastion of right-wing propaganda.

At least $1.1 billion was paid directly into UN coffers, supposedly to cover the cost of administering the $67 billion scheme, while Saddam Hussein diverted funds intended for the poor and sick of Iraq to bribe foreign governments and prominent overseas supporters of his regime. . . .

Although the UN Security Council approved the plan to levy a 2.2 per cent commission on each oil-for-food transaction, the huge sums this reaped for the UN have never been fully accounted for.

A senior UN official who is closely involved in uncovering evidence of the scandal admitted: "The UN was not doing this work just for the good of Iraq. Cash from Saddam's government was keeping the UN going for a few years.

"No one knows exactly what sums were involved because an audit has never been done. That is why they are wriggling and squirming now in New York."

Micro-Shells: The next step in Windows customization?

Published on Saturday, April 24, 2004 By Brad Wardell In OS Customization

Where will customization go from here? Are we at our limits of what we can do to customize Windows? The answer is, not by a long shot. In the past year we have seen a movement towards widgetizing the desktop. On MacOS X Konfabulator is a popular program for adding desktop widgets. On Windows, DesktopX provides similar functionality. These programs help bridge the distance between icons and full fledged programs.

But that's really just a taste. One place Stardock sees things moving in the future, especially as Longhorn nears and Windows XP becomes the defacto standard in businesses, is the concept of Micro-Shells.  In the old days, programs tried to replace the entire shell (explorer). Micro-Shells instead extend pieces of the shell. One part of the shell Stardock is particularly interested in extending in the future is the folder views. We don't want to replace what's there. What we want to do is extend it so that there are other ways of viewing the files in a directory (folder) than what we have today.

We take this view for granted. But really, it's kind of a one size fits all. Sure, you can make them be thumbnails or lists, but that's pretty weak. Stardock has experimented with adding more views with "Treeview" in Object Desktop but it has proven challenging to make it robust.

Object Desktop includes "Tree View" which is an experiment in trying to add a new view to Explorer.

What is really needed is a robust, way for third parties to be able to fundamentally change bits and pieces of the shell. Hence, Micro-Shells. Different Micro-Shells could be installed on your computer to re-arrange how you might view things. A Micro-Shell to extend the standard folder metaphor might include ways of viewing your data as a book. Or maybe display things like your Tivo does. Let's face it, these days, we deal with so many different kinds of data that we need vastly more ways to view and organize it. Users could right click on a folder and select which view they want it to default to.

Right now this is it. These are your options for customizing a folder. Imagine instead a way where users who download a micro-shell that extends the folder views could actually design up their own folder view and upload it to a website like WinCustomize.com. Once installed, it would show up on this list. Some of these would be cosmetic but like the widgets of today, some of these could be highly useful. A simple one would be designed to display as many files with basic details as possible. Another one might be designed specifically for displaying movies in a way that isn't just thumbnails. Another view might display the contents like a report with files linked into it. It all depends on what the purpose of a given folder is. As it stands now, there is no easy way to add more views to this list. You've got 7. And of those 7, most of them are pretty much the same.

Once a micro-shell for extending the folder view mechanism is done, other micro-shells become possible. There are lots of areas in Windows that could be tweaked or expanded in ways that are subtle or profound. Controlling how the mouse works in interacting with items on your computer to adding mouse gestures to changing the way context menus work. The point of micro-shells is to expand the functionality of the Windows shell seamlessly so that you don't end up bloating it up and slowing things down.  It may be until Longhorn comes out before Micro-Shells are able to be done to the Nth degree but I think this is going to become one of the "next big things" in customization.

-Brad Wardell

Micro-Shells: The next generation in Windows customization?

Published on Friday, April 23, 2004 By Brad Wardell In WinCustomize News

Where will customization go from here? Are we at our limits of what we can do to customize Windows? The answer is, not by a long shot. In the past year we have seen a movement towards widgetizing the desktop. On MacOS X Konfabulator is a popular program for adding desktop widgets. On Windows, DesktopX provides similar functionality. These programs help bridge the distance between icons and full fledged programs.

But that's really just a taste. One place Stardock sees things moving in the future, especially as Longhorn nears and Windows XP becomes the defacto standard in businesses, is the concept of Micro-Shells.  In the old days, programs tried to replace the entire shell (explorer). Micro-Shells instead extend pieces of the shell. One part of the shell Stardock is particularly interested in extending in the future is the folder views. We don't want to replace what's there. What we want to do is extend it so that there are other ways of viewing the files in a directory (folder) than what we have today.

We take this view for granted. But really, it's kind of a one size fits all. Sure, you can make them be thumbnails or lists, but that's pretty weak. Stardock has experimented with adding more views with "Treeview" in Object Desktop but it has proven challenging to make it robust.

Object Desktop includes "Tree View" which is an experiment in trying to add a new view to Explorer.

What is really needed is a robust, way for third parties to be able to fundamentally change bits and pieces of the shell. Hence, Micro-Shells. Different Micro-Shells could be installed on your computer to re-arrange how you might view things. A Micro-Shell to extend the standard folder metaphor might include ways of viewing your data as a book. Or maybe display things like your Tivo does. Let's face it, these days, we deal with so many different kinds of data that we need vastly more ways to view and organize it. Users could right click on a folder and select which view they want it to default to.

Right now this is it. These are your options for customizing a folder. Imagine instead a way where users who download a micro-shell that extends the folder views could actually design up their own folder view and upload it to a website like WinCustomize.com. Once installed, it would show up on this list. Some of these would be cosmetic but like the widgets of today, some of these could be highly useful. A simple one would be designed to display as many files with basic details as possible. Another one might be designed specifically for displaying movies in a way that isn't just thumbnails. Another view might display the contents like a report with files linked into it. It all depends on what the purpose of a given folder is. As it stands now, there is no easy way to add more views to this list. You've got 7. And of those 7, most of them are pretty much the same.

Once a micro-shell for extending the folder view mechanism is done, other micro-shells become possible. There are lots of areas in Windows that could be tweaked or expanded in ways that are subtle or profound. Controlling how the mouse works in interacting with items on your computer to adding mouse gestures to changing the way context menus work. The point of micro-shells is to expand the functionality of the Windows shell seamlessly so that you don't end up bloating it up and slowing things down.  It may be until Longhorn comes out before Micro-Shells are able to be done to the Nth degree but I think this is going to become one of the "next big things" in customization.

-Brad Wardell

How Apple stole SGI's Hollywood business

Published on Friday, April 23, 2004 By Brad Wardell In WinCustomize News

OSNews.com has a great article that talks about how Apple has usurped a lot of the business SGI used to have in Hollywood movies. Remember when SGI was almost synonymous with special effects houses? Increasingly, Apple is moving into that field.

Even here at Stardock we've been tempted to use Apple servers for game rendering. Mac servers are becoming increasingly easy to cluster together and gain all the other advantages that Linux clusters have without having to be a Linux techie to do it. Follow the link for the full story.

GUI Olympics: Time is running out!

Published on Friday, April 23, 2004 By Brad Wardell In WinCustomize News

There's only one full week left before the start of judging of the various events! And right now, the Winamp and IconPackager categories are relatively open still ($10,000 in cash and prizes just between those two categories).

Visit www.guiolympics.com for more details!

TIME IS RUNNING OUT!

Published on Friday, April 23, 2004 By Brad Wardell In GUI Championships News
Next week is the last full week to send in submissions to the GUI Olympics. And as of today, there are only 17 Winamp skins and 17 icon packages in the contest.

With $15,000 in cash and prizes at stake, this creates a big opportunity for skinners to make a name for themselves and win some great stuff!