Brad Wardell's Blog


GUI Olympics week 3 rants, trademarks, videos, and more.

Published on Thursday, May 27, 2004 By Brad Wardell In OS Customization

I remember now why I don't like doing GUI Olympics/Championships. The horror...the horror. There's always someone who thinks their entry is the end all be all and wants to make everyone miserable for not being given their kudos.

I'm used to the WindowBlinds community or more specifically, the WinCustomize community. The world's largest skinning community that is also one of the most friendly and mature.  It's a fun place to hang out with. A place where the skinners are more diplomatic than most of the users!

And this week the results of the GUI Olympics were particularly tough because there were so many great skins to choose from. And the icons that have been made have reached quality levels that were simply..breathtaking.  Fortunately, I'm not an official judge. But in a way, I wish I were. Because me and Pat have put massive hours (again) into this contest and yet we have very little control over the results. So if people don't like the results, they blame the contest as a whole which I tend to take a bit personally since I've poured so much time into it.

This is particularly true on the Winamp skins where the judging is mostly at the discretion of the Nullsoft judges. I don't think Voodoo (the Neowin judge) participated in the Winamp judging this week. But the judges are exceptionally qualified. First, my friend Jark, the man behind deviantART, the largest art community in the world. Secondly, you have two judges from Nullsoft itself, makers of Winamp. You'd be hard pressed to find a more prestigious and excellent set of judges than that.  And I think they've done a great job.

The results on the Winamp skins seem good to me. I'm just going by screenshots but they look good. But apparently some portions of the Winamp community weren't satisfied with them so they've taken out their angst on the contest by making it very loud that they think the contest is a joke. And in classic "shoot the messenger" a lot of the abuse was heaped on me personally even though I'm not even involved on the Winamp stuff.

To put things in contrast, on the WindowBlinds and icon packages area I could definitely see artists who could be rightfully miffed. It was sooo close on some of them. One of my personal favorite icon packages, Alloy Bezel, didn't win best themed. In fact, it didn't even place in the top 3. I was made for him.

But did you see Ian Black (vf) out there screaming about it? No. He has class. He's a real pro. And Treetog's PirateOS icons were outsanding too. Designed specifically for the pseudo-OS icon event. And Treetog is one of the most popular skinners in history. But he didn't place in the top 3.  Do you see Treetog out there ranting and raving? No. Again, he has class.

And DigitalChet's Sugarfree skin just barely missed placing in the best themed WindowBlinds skin. But has he written up some long complaint? No. In fact, none of the WindowBlinds authors were out there complaining even though there are over 100 WindowBlinds skins out there. It's about sportsmanship.

But from some of the Winamp artists/coders we get "your contest is a joke!", personal attacks, and other nastiness. Why? Some of them calling the prizes a joke in the Winamp area. Those who know me know that while I have a thick skin, I have a real weak spot for people who mistakenly believe they have leverage. I got email from a couple Winamp users saying how they hate Stardock now (as if Stardock were somehow at fault for the Winamp skin results). Another couple of users threatened to pull their skins out. That's insane thinking. Exactly how does it harm Stardock if there are Winamp skins in the contest or not? If every Winamp skin author pulled their skin, how does that harm us? The contest is there to promote skinning and we wanted Winamp to be involved because we like the guys at Nullsoft and we wanted to help highlight Winamp skinning and help promote Winamp 5. The GUI Olympics has gotten a lot of traffic. Having Winamp in the contest helps Winamp. It doesn't affect Stardock. But threatening Stardock to pull your Winamp skins is akin to threatening Microsoft to quit using ICQ.

There was more than one person at Stardock scratching their heads asking why we included Winamp instead of promoting ObjectMedia / DesktopX media playing. As cool as Winamp is, DesktopX is just as capable of doing media players: Full alpha blending, seamless animation,  all the features of WMP, VB Script, Java script support, etc.  But we didn't feel that ObjectMedia was popular enough to warrant that. Winamp, IMO, started skinning on Windows and we felt it had earned its place.  But the nastiness of the vocal elements of the Winamp community have definitely taken the shine off those warm and fuzzy feelings.

A New Name?

Speaking of traffic, no matter how you slice it, this will be the last GUI Olympics under that name. The US Olympic Commission has requested that we not use the name Olympics. Now, you can debate whether they have the right to trademark the name "Olympic" or not but we're not going to mess with it. So if there's another contest in the future like this, it'll be called something else.

WindowBlinds skinning

I don't think some people realize everything that goes into a WindowBlinds skin. This is particularly true of msstyles advocates who think of a GUI skin via the limitations of msstyles. Hence the complaining of results on the WindowBlinds side has mostly come from msstyles advocates who don't realize that WindowBlinds skins can have toolbar icons, progress animations, sound effects, wallpapers, animation, etc.  Animation, for instance, needn't slow down the computer - particularly if well used. And many of the best WindowBlinds skins this year are truly complete in this regard.

But when the "best overall" skin portion comes to play, I can almost imagine hearing some screaming from the people who think of skins as just being the title bar and borders and maybe a clever Start bar. I don't know what the judges will end up going by. Maybe they'll ignore all the other elements if they're missing.

But personally, I think having replacement progress animations and some carefully used sound, and toolbar icons and such matter to a degree. I get weary of hearing people who say "I don't want all that bloat!" Well fine, use classic. I'm skinning my GUI for a reason. I like it being different. That's the whole point. And my laptop runs these things just fine. They don't slow up my work.

Speaking of work...

In final testing for The Political Machine. Been working on the AI a lot on that. I use my machine very intensely for software development and I have DesktopX, ObjectBar. WindowBlinds and WindowFX running pretty much full time. I always wonder about these people who yell about skinning slowing down their computers. It makes me wonder what they do on their computers that is so taxing. Maybe their computers are infested with Spyware or something slowing them down.

Anyway, I hope I don't sound too cranky. It's never fun to have people tell you that you don't know anything about skinning or calling something you've put hundreds of hours into a joke as you can imagine. I can say that I'm really proud of the results of the GUI Olympics so far. I think particularly the WindowBlinds and icon artists have demonstrated a real level of class and maturity. When I saw the results, I could see why what won won even though they weren't necessarily my favorites (particularly on themed icons). But on the other hand, the quality of these things is just stunning. 28 icon packages, each having >100 icons. That's almost 3,000 icons were created and most of them with sizes up to 128x128 down to 16x16. We're talking massive effort there and the quality is stunning.

On that note, here's a link to a demo I did of some of the skins and icons of the GUI Olympics.

Video: GUI Olympics, Weeks 2 and 3...

Brad's Skinning Blog: GUI Olympics rants, trademarks, videos, and what's in a skin...

Published on Thursday, May 27, 2004 By Brad Wardell In WinCustomize News

I remember now why I don't like doing GUI Olympics/Championships. The horror...the horror. There's always someone who thinks their entry is the end all be all and wants to make everyone miserable for not being given their kudos.

I'm used to the WindowBlinds community or more specifically, the WinCustomize community. The world's largest skinning community that is also one of the most friendly and mature.  It's a fun place to hang out with. A place where the skinners are more diplomatic than most of the users!

And this week the results of the GUI Olympics were particularly tough because there were so many great skins to choose from. And the icons that have been made have reached quality levels that were simply..breathtaking.  Fortunately, I'm not an official judge. But in a way, I wish I were. Because me and Pat have put massive hours (again) into this contest and yet we have very little control over the results. So if people don't like the results, they blame the contest as a whole which I tend to take a bit personally since I've poured so much time into it.

This is particularly true on the Winamp skins where the judging is mostly at the discretion of the Nullsoft judges. I don't think Voodoo (the Neowin judge) participated in the Winamp judging this week. But the judges are exceptionally qualified. First, my friend Jark, the man behind deviantART, the largest art community in the world. Secondly, you have two judges from Nullsoft itself, makers of Winamp. You'd be hard pressed to find a more prestigious and excellent set of judges than that.  And I think they've done a great job.

The results on the Winamp skins seem good to me. I'm just going by screenshots but they look good. But apparently some portions of the Winamp community weren't satisfied with them so they've taken out their angst on the contest by making it very loud that they think the contest is a joke. And in classic "shoot the messenger" a lot of the abuse was heaped on me personally even though I'm not even involved on the Winamp stuff.

To put things in contrast, on the WindowBlinds and icon packages area I could definitely see artists who could be rightfully miffed. It was sooo close on some of them. One of my personal favorite icon packages, Alloy Bezel, didn't win best themed. In fact, it didn't even place in the top 3. I was made for him.

But did you see Ian Black (vf) out there screaming about it? No. He has class. He's a real pro. And Treetog's PirateOS icons were outsanding too. Designed specifically for the pseudo-OS icon event. And Treetog is one of the most popular skinners in history. But he didn't place in the top 3.  Do you see Treetog out there ranting and raving? No. Again, he has class.

And DigitalChet's Sugarfree skin just barely missed placing in the best themed WindowBlinds skin. But has he written up some long complaint? No. In fact, none of the WindowBlinds authors were out there complaining even though there are over 100 WindowBlinds skins out there. It's about sportsmanship.

But from some of the Winamp artists/coders we get "your contest is a joke!", personal attacks, and other nastiness. Why? Some of them calling the prizes a joke in the Winamp area. Those who know me know that while I have a thick skin, I have a real weak spot for people who mistakenly believe they have leverage. I got email from a couple Winamp users saying how they hate Stardock now (as if Stardock were somehow at fault for the Winamp skin results). Another couple of users threatened to pull their skins out. That's insane thinking. Exactly how does it harm Stardock if there are Winamp skins in the contest or not? If every Winamp skin author pulled their skin, how does that harm us? The contest is there to promote skinning and we wanted Winamp to be involved because we like the guys at Nullsoft and we wanted to help highlight Winamp skinning and help promote Winamp 5. The GUI Olympics has gotten a lot of traffic. Having Winamp in the contest helps Winamp. It doesn't affect Stardock. But threatening Stardock to pull your Winamp skins is akin to threatening Microsoft to quit using ICQ.

There was more than one person at Stardock scratching their heads asking why we included Winamp instead of promoting ObjectMedia / DesktopX media playing. As cool as Winamp is, DesktopX is just as capable of doing media players: Full alpha blending, seamless animation,  all the features of WMP, VB Script, Java script support, etc.  But we didn't feel that ObjectMedia was popular enough to warrant that. Winamp, IMO, started skinning on Windows and we felt it had earned its place.  But the nastiness of the vocal elements of the Winamp community have definitely taken the shine off those warm and fuzzy feelings.

A New Name?

Speaking of traffic, no matter how you slice it, this will be the last GUI Olympics under that name. The US Olympic Commission has requested that we not use the name Olympics. Now, you can debate whether they have the right to trademark the name "Olympic" or not but we're not going to mess with it. So if there's another contest in the future like this, it'll be called something else.

WindowBlinds skinning

I don't think some people realize everything that goes into a WindowBlinds skin. This is particularly true of msstyles advocates who think of a GUI skin via the limitations of msstyles. Hence the complaining of results on the WindowBlinds side has mostly come from msstyles advocates who don't realize that WindowBlinds skins can have toolbar icons, progress animations, sound effects, wallpapers, animation, etc.  Animation, for instance, needn't slow down the computer - particularly if well used. And many of the best WindowBlinds skins this year are truly complete in this regard.

But when the "best overall" skin portion comes to play, I can almost imagine hearing some screaming from the people who think of skins as just being the title bar and borders and maybe a clever Start bar. I don't know what the judges will end up going by. Maybe they'll ignore all the other elements if they're missing.

But personally, I think having replacement progress animations and some carefully used sound, and toolbar icons and such matter to a degree. I get weary of hearing people who say "I don't want all that bloat!" Well fine, use classic. I'm skinning my GUI for a reason. I like it being different. That's the whole point. And my laptop runs these things just fine. They don't slow up my work.

Speaking of work...

In final testing for The Political Machine. Been working on the AI a lot on that. I use my machine very intensely for software development and I have DesktopX, ObjectBar. WindowBlinds and WindowFX running pretty much full time. I always wonder about these people who yell about skinning slowing down their computers. It makes me wonder what they do on their computers that is so taxing. Maybe their computers are infested with Spyware or something slowing them down.

Anyway, I hope I don't sound too cranky. It's never fun to have people tell you that you don't know anything about skinning or calling something you've put hundreds of hours into a joke as you can imagine. I can say that I'm really proud of the results of the GUI Olympics so far. I think particularly the WindowBlinds and icon artists have demonstrated a real level of class and maturity. When I saw the results, I could see why what won won even though they weren't necessarily my favorites (particularly on themed icons). But on the other hand, the quality of these things is just stunning. 28 icon packages, each having >100 icons. That's almost 3,000 icons were created and most of them with sizes up to 128x128 down to 16x16. We're talking massive effort there and the quality is stunning.

On that note, here's a link to a demo I did of some of the skins and icons of the GUI Olympics.

Video: GUI Olympics, Weeks 2 and 3...

Meet the judges

Published on Wednesday, May 26, 2004 By Brad Wardell In GUI Championships News
The official judges for the GUI Olympics are:

On WindowBlinds skins: 1) Voodoo from Neowin 2) Jark from deviantART 3) Kris from Stardock 4) Angie from Stardock 5) Paul from Stardock

On Winamp skins: 1) Steve from Nullsoft 2) Jonathan from Nullsoft 3) Jark from deviantART 4) Voodoo from Neowin 5) Kris from Stardock

On Icon packages 1) Paul from Stardock 2) Pat from Stardock 3) Kris from Stardock 4) Angie from Stardock 5) Jark from deviantART 6) Voodoo from Neowin

These judges are experts in their area. No specific criteria other than the description of the event was used in their judging (i.e. each performed their judging based on their own way of doing it).

Obviously with so many incredibly good entries, there will be disagreement (even amongst judges) over who is the best and such. On many of the events, the difference between 1st and 5th is just a few points which is incredibly close.

Few contests have such a concentration of knowledgeable experts judging the events. In some instances, when the top skins have been narrowed to just a handful, the skins are used over a period of time to determine which has a benefit over another.

The entries this year have been outstanding making judging particularly difficult. The 2002 GUI Olympics had a great number of terrific entries but usually a few stood out above the others in a given event. Or to put it another way, it wasn't usually that close. This time around, with so many incredible entries, it's been very tight.

We're about half-way done with this year's contest. At the end of the judged events, WinCustomize subscribers will be able to judge for themselves in the User's choice awards where we've saved some extra goodies for those winning entries.

And coming up: The all important BEST OVERALL SKINS/ICONS!

Stay tuned!

GUI Olympics Week 3 results

Published on Wednesday, May 26, 2004 By Brad Wardell In WinCustomize News

After lengthy and careful consideration, here are the results for week 3 of the GUI Olympics.

Event: WindowBlinds - Most creative visual style

Rank Author Skin
MikeB314 Airlock
essorant Pixel 8
^^Gabriel G-Pod
treetog Antares
danilloOC Sektor

Event: IconPackager - Best themed (icons that fit a specific theme) icon package

Rank Author Skin
treetog Thunder Storm (Icons)
volter15 Smile 3 ))
farid nafar HFN Sapphire

Event: WinAmp Pro - Most usable Winamp skin

Rank Author Skin
Andrew Mackowski EMP 2
Anemovatis AR7
kriptoner D-Reliction

Event: WindowBlinds - Best themed visual style (a visual style that fits a specific theme)

Rank Author Skin
treetog Thunder Storm WB
- vf - Alloy Bezel 4
Scarebear 10pin
EventHorizon Mime

Event: IconPackager - Best Pseudo-OS icon package (an icon package that you could see coming with an operating system)

Rank Author Skin
Miloszwl d3A
Leothar Amdio
Rokey The Last Order

Event: WinAmp Pro - Best power user Winamp skin

Rank Author Skin
Andrew Mackowski EMP 2
a-t-o-m-i-c Impulse
Muniom Designs Resurgence

Visit WWW.GUIOLYMPICS.COM to check out and use these great entries!

GUI Olympics: Week 3 Results

Published on Wednesday, May 26, 2004 By Brad Wardell In GUI Championships News

Week 3 results!

After lengthy and careful consideration, here are the results for week 3 of the GUI Olympics.

Event: WindowBlinds - Most creative visual style

Rank Author Skin
MikeB314 Airlock
essorant Pixel 8
^^Gabriel G-Pod
treetog Antares
danilloOC Sektor

Event: IconPackager - Best themed (icons that fit a specific theme) icon package

Rank Author Skin
treetog Thunder Storm (Icons)
volter15 Smile 3 ))
farid nafar HFN Sapphire

Event: WinAmp Pro - Most usable Winamp skin

Rank Author Skin
Andrew Mackowski EMP 2
Anemovatis AR7
kriptoner D-Reliction

Event: WindowBlinds - Best themed visual style (a visual style that fits a specific theme)

Rank Author Skin
treetog Thunder Storm WB
- vf - Alloy Bezel 4
Scarebear 10pin
EventHorizon Mime

Event: IconPackager - Best Pseudo-OS icon package (an icon package that you could see coming with an operating system)

Rank Author Skin
Miloszwl d3A
Leothar Amdio
Rokey The Last Order

Event: WinAmp Pro - Best power user Winamp skin

Rank Author Skin
Andrew Mackowski EMP 2
a-t-o-m-i-c Impulse
Muniom Designs Resurgence

 

BootSkin rainbow...

Published on Wednesday, May 26, 2004 By Brad Wardell In WinCustomize News

BootSkin is a program that lets you safely change your Windows boot screen. The way it works is that it actually installs a boot screen device driver that loads when you boot up Windows.

Version 1.05 works for most people. But over the months we've found that some drivers interfere with BootSkin and those people experience weird problems with BootSkin. For those people, we have made available previous versions of BootSkin which worked on some of those computers (but not others -- there doesn't seem to be a 100% solution so far). 

For those of you who have tried BootSkin 1.05 and ran into problems, please visit the BootSkin site and try out 1.02 or 1.03 and let us know below whether it solved your problem. If you can also tell us your hardware configuration, we can then see if there is something they have in common.

BootSkin 1.05 works on all of Stardock's internal compatibility lab machines (of which there are a LOT of machines) along with our external beta network. So the only way those people who can't get 1.05 to work is to work with us and help us find a solution. Thanks! 

WinCustomize Magazine: May 2004

Published on Tuesday, May 25, 2004 By Brad Wardell In WinCustomize News

For those of you who don't subscribe to WinCustomize Magazine via email, here is the May edition of WinCustomize Magazine.

In this issue:

  • Universe Metal 2004 released!
  • Some highlights from the GUI Olympics
  • The menace of Spyware
  • Skinning highlights of May
  • Object Desktop 2004
  • and more!

On deck: Best pseudo-OS visual style

Published on Tuesday, May 25, 2004 By Brad Wardell In GUI Championships News
Coming onto the judges radar this week is the best Pseudo-OS visual style. Which WindowBlinds skin could you imagine being the default skin of some operating system? Not what skin looks like an existing operating system, just which one do you think would make a good skin for an operating system?

Mistakes Shareware authors make

Published on Tuesday, May 25, 2004 By Brad Wardell In Business

* What mistakes cost shareware developers the most money?

Shareware authors that are too stingy in their restrictions initially or too easy in restrictions later on.  When you make a program, it needs to be usable enough that the potential customer can see what it does and how well it does it.  Some authors will cripple their program so much in fear that people won’t register it if it’s fully usable. But what happens is doing that causes the user to stop evaluating in and kills the network effect (which I’ll talk about more in a second).

But at the other end of the spectrum you have developers who never have any time-outs on their shareware.  At some point, in my view, all unregistered shareware should time out. Even if that time out period is very long (90 days) it will have long since maximized its network effect and the user has certainly had enough time to evaluate it.  Similarly, there needs to be a few “nice to have” features that aren’t core to the product’s usefulness that are restricted.

For example, if I were making a ZIP program, I would have the compressing and uncompressing features be free. But the password protection be disabled in the free version. But other than that be fully functional. On the other hand, after 120 days or so, I would still have it time out. That way, you are able to convert both types of users: The user who needs a certain feature and the user who has standardized on it.

With regards to the network effect, this is very important in shareware – you want people evaluating your product to be the ones who also promote it. If they are using your program, they’re likely to give it to someone else. Even if they don’t ultimately choose to buy it,  the longer they use it (up to a point) the more likely they are to recommend it to someone else who may then recommend it.


* What mistake has cost YOU the most money?

Overestimating the market for something.  One of our most useful and best programs is called Keyboard LaunchPad. It’s only $9.95 to register and it lets users assign pretty much anything they might do on their computer to a hot key (program launching, system commands, remembered clipboard contents, commands for specific programs, you name it).  We thought this would sell very well. But we’ve been very surprised at how low its sales are.  That sort of mistake can be quite costly.

Another mistake we’ve made on occasion is having our demos be too restricted. We’ve done this with WindowFX repeatedly because we haven’t figured out which features are “core” and which ones are not. So users will try it and stop evaluating it early because they’ll find too many features have been disabled from the free version.

The biggest, ongoing mistake we make is not releasing regular updates to our shareware versions.  We tend to believe that shareware versions need to be updated every 90 days on various sites for maximum popularity. But it’s often a pain (especially now) to go around updating those programs. But that effort pays off in increased sales but it’s just so tedious no one wants to do it.

Just like me, they long to see, Dick Cheney

Published on Monday, May 24, 2004 By Brad Wardell In Blogging

My wife and I had a great time last night. One of my co-workers got married and it was a great night. They had a terrific reception with good music, dancing, etc. My wife and I boogied all night together.

But the guy who got hitched, he's our lead cartoonist on The Political Machine. We realized yesterday that we don't have an image of Dick Cheney in the game. During the reception, they were asking people to sing a song to get them to kiss.

Here's what I came up with: (sung to "Close to you")

Why do betas suddenly seem late
When the image, misses the date.
Just like me, they long to see, Dick Cheney.
La...lal la la....Dick Cheney.

Needless to say, I do not have a good singing voice.