Brad Wardell's Blog


Iraq after June 30

Published on Thursday, May 20, 2004 By Brad Wardell In Politics

On June 30 Iraq begins to officially be run again by Iraqi's. That is the date of turning over sovereignty to them.

The question then becomes, what's next? What should the US role in Iraq be?

Personally, I would be in favor of a referendum in Iraq asking the simple question: Do you want the US military to remain in Iraq to help provide security and stabilization services or do you want the US military to leave.

Whichever the Iraqi's desire the US should follow-up in my mind. If they want the US out, the US should leave. If they want the US to stay, we should stay and help.  If the Iraqi's chose to have the US stay in there, then hopefully the opponents of the US position in Iraq would recognize that the US is trying to help there.

Personally, I don't care either way.  For me and others like me who supported the military action in Iraq, it was always about removing Saddam Hussein. He's gone now. Mission accomplished.  Being able to help build a stable democracy in Iraq is definitely a nice goal to have but it isn't a requirement to the mission and should only be pursued if the population of Iraq wants it. 

The Political Machine: Beta 4 available

Published on Thursday, May 20, 2004 By Brad Wardell In Political Machine News

The beta 4 series will be the last set of public betas of The Political Machine. After that, it'll be on an individual basis based on feedback and such.  Hopefully this version corrects any remaining technical glitches.

Just a reminder:

1) This game requires DirectX 9
2) It needs a 3D video card with typically 16 megs of RAM or more on it (so some laptops or very old machines may have problems)

Remember: At this point, the game is running flawlessly in our internal compatibility lab. Don't assume that we know about a problem you're having. So if you experience crashing or corrupt graphics or anything else, REPORT IT PLEASE HERE. We need to know what operating system you're running and what video card you have in order to duplicate.

This version has the campaign mode in it.  Please let us know how well it works for you. We will be doing bug fixes like crazy of course between now and going gold. We also hope to release a free update after general availability to take into account new events in this year's political race and any cool ideas people come up with that can be added to the game (those of you who were beta testers on Galactic Civilizations know what we mean).

GUI Olympics: Week 2 results!

Published on Thursday, May 20, 2004 By Brad Wardell In WinCustomize News

The 2004 GUI Olympics

Results: WEEK 2

EVENT: Most Usable Visual Style

This event asked skin authors to create a visual style that people would find themselves using long after the contest was over.

GUI Olympics 2004 WindowBlinds
Fly OS treetog

GUI Olympics 2004 WindowBlinds
Vector-Cell b0se

GUI Olympics 2004 WindowBlinds
Luna - HoE Erik Holmer

EVENT: Most Original Icon Package

This event asked icon designers to come up with the most original complete set of icons that could be used with IconPackager. Some outstanding entries were in this category and the winners are:

GUI Olympics 2004 IconPackager
Dementæcon MindlessPuppet

GUI Olympics 2004 IconPackager
d3A Miloszwl

GUI Olympics 2004 IconPackager
Megaton - vf -

(tie)

GUI Olympics 2004 IconPackager
The Last Order Rokey

(tie)

EVENT: Most Creative Winamp skin

Which Winamp skin was the most original overall? This was a pretty tough call for our judges as there were some really wild designs. But when the dust settled, here were the winners (and it was close. we mean really close)...

GUI Olympics 2004 Winamp
Enkera 883
GUI Olympics 2004 Winamp
Machina vrank
GUI Olympics 2004 Winamp
Copter UUL

Congratulations to all the winners. This week had some incredibly close events. Judges go through and give skins up to 10 points. And when it was all done, some of these entries won by only a point or two over what came in 4th or 5th.

Because of how close things have been, the Best overall skin will be individually judged rather than just adding medal points up (we had left this up in the air to see how things went). So the overall winners may be different from the winners of the individual events. Stay tuned!

Congratulations to all!

Blaming the victims of terrorists

Published on Thursday, May 20, 2004 By Brad Wardell In Current Events

I wrote an article the other day that asked a pretty straight forward question: What do you think the US response would be if terrorists smuggled in a nuclear weapon into New York and set it off killing tens of thousands of people.

The responses were quite surprising. Hardly anyone actually answered the question. I was interested in hearing various response scenarios. Instead, the comments area got filled with people preemptively blaming the whole thing on the United States.  Apparently, in the eyes of some people, there is no deed too terrible that the US doesn't deserve it.

You can almost imagine the kind of thinking that resulted in the holocaust. The holocaust in Europe occurred because the general population in the areas it took place in did nothing to prevent it. More recent historians have made the case that the general population had slowly concluded that "the jews" had it coming. That this was all retribution for a whole host of perceived injustices.

In the mind of some, for instance, various vague acts by the United States serve as ample justification for the wholesale murder of Americans by Islamic terrorists.  When I asked what those acts were in another article, the answers included "The Bay of pigs invasion, Interference in Chile, support of Israel".  Ah, yes, I can see the connection between Cuba and Islamic terrorists flying air planes into the WTC in an effort to murder as many Americans at once as possible.

Psychologically, this holocaust-like mentality is pretty easy to demonstrate. If you reverse the scenario, the US still remains the bad guy.  For example, if the US response after 9/11 was the wholesale destruction of Islam, the US remains the bad guy. None of them say "Well, they deserved their destruction!" When Americans die wholesale, they say "Ask yourselves why they hate you" If the US retaliates for a very specific murderous act in kind, they don't say to the targets of this wrath "Ask yourselves why they hate you."  No matter what the scenario is, the US is the bad guy.

If you hate something enough, you can justify any heinous act. Those who hate the United States  are able to justify virtually any horrific act done to Americans. Yet, without a trace of irony, can turn around and passionately argue how wrong it would be to respond in kind. Americans, in their view, just need to accept that they're part of an evil nation and suck it down until Karmic retribution has been completed.

Which is, of course, absurd and contrary to human nature. If someone comes up to you and pops you in the nose and kicks you in the groin, your first reaction is not going to be to think about why you deserved it. Similarly, one is not going to look fondly at someone claiming to be your friend who explains that you really deserve to get beat up by this guy because you slighted him indirectly in some unintentional way long ago.  In the real world, if someone comes up and physically assaults you, you're likely going to have to fight back.

I suspect some people would find it absurd if I wrote "Perhaps those abused POWs in Iraq need to ask - why did their guards hate them?"  Because that's how absurd most Americans find the suggestion that 9/11 or some hypothetical future nuclear terrorist attack was our fault.

WEEK 2 RESULTS!

Published on Wednesday, May 19, 2004 By Brad Wardell In GUI Championships News

The 2004 GUI Olympics

Results: WEEK 2

EVENT: Most Usable Visual Style

This event asked skin authors to create a visual style that people would find themselves using long after the contest was over.

GUI Olympics 2004 WindowBlinds
Fly OS treetog

GUI Olympics 2004 WindowBlinds
Vector-Cell b0se

GUI Olympics 2004 WindowBlinds
Luna - HoE Erik Holmer

EVENT: Most Original Icon Package

This event asked icon designers to come up with the most original complete set of icons that could be used with IconPackager. Some outstanding entries were in this category and the winners are:

GUI Olympics 2004 IconPackager
Dementæcon MindlessPuppet

GUI Olympics 2004 IconPackager
d3A Miloszwl

GUI Olympics 2004 IconPackager
Megaton - vf -

(tie)

GUI Olympics 2004 IconPackager
The Last Order Rokey

(tie)

EVENT: Most Creative Winamp skin

Which Winamp skin was the most original overall? This was a pretty tough call for our judges as there were some really wild designs. But when the dust settled, here were the winners (and it was close. we mean really close)...

GUI Olympics 2004 Winamp
Enkera 883
GUI Olympics 2004 Winamp
Machina vrank
GUI Olympics 2004 Winamp
Copter UUL

Congratulations to all the winners. This week had some incredibly close events. Judges go through and give skins up to 10 points. And when it was all done, some of these entries won by only a point or two over what came in 4th or 5th.

Because of how close things have been, the Best overall skin will be individually judged rather than just adding medal points up (we had left this up in the air to see how things went). So the overall winners may be different from the winners of the individual events. Stay tuned!

Congratulations to all!

SDTV: Widget Making, The GUI Olympics Week 1, DirectGUI..

Published on Wednesday, May 19, 2004 By Brad Wardell In OS Customization

On this month's Stardock TV we look at DirectGUI in action, the first week of the GUI Olympics, IconX, and how to make widgets!

The first week of the GUI Olympics has concluded. We're just getting started and the winners were from teams SkinPlant which leads the medal count with 3 medals, team Pixtudio with 2 medals and last year's returning champion, deviantART with 1 medal.

Some outstanding entries this year have made it incredibly hard for the judges to decide amongst them. They were all very very close in ratings.

The first two events both were in the WindowBlinds visual styles. Stardock has been also taking notes on how skin authors are creating skins. As skinning has gotten more powerful, it's gotten more complex and that complexity can translate into weird graphics glitches as minor bugs crop into skins.

Stardock has spent the past couple of weeks looking closely what bugs are common. For example, most skin authors don't set their caption height (misc: skin metrics: caption height) which is supposed to be the same height as the title bar. Some programs make use of that metric to decide how large their title bars and child window title bars should be.

Take a look below to see video demos of the top skins in action.

Do Amazing Things GUI Olympics Week 1 (large) 67M

Do Amazing Things GUI Olympics Week 1 (small) 17M

 

DirectGUI in action!

Meanwhile, DesktopX 2.2 entered into beta with a whole new Direct GUI underpinning. DirectGUI is really the power behind DesktopX. With it, all kinds of visual functionality can be added to the Windows desktop that can be controlled by programs and scripts.

We've got lots of interesting demos of that in action.

Do Amazing Things DirectGUI in action (large) 47M

Do Amazing Things DirectGUI in action (small) 16M

 

That wasn't the only place the DesktopX got to strut its stuff. Here's a guide on how you can make your own widgets for DesktopX.  It's incredibly easy. Just draw out what you want your widget or program to look like with a paint program, save it, and load the saved image up into a DesktopX object and off you go. Check out how easy it is here:

Do Amazing Things Making Widgets (large) 35M

Do Amazing Things Making Widgets (small) 16M

Speaking of DesktopX, one of the coolest features about it is IconX. Check out this mini-video of it in action.

On the horizon...

WindowBlinds 4.3 is now out there and SkinStudio 4.3 is just about done.  SkinStudio 4.3 has two major new features in it over 4.2.  First, it takes advantage of changes in WindowBlinds 4.3 so that msstyles can be imported into WindowBlinds as native WB visual styles.  Secondly, it makes it easy to export progress animations and toolbar icons which will help launch the upcoming WinCustomize.com sections for those two things.

We'll also be showing how easy it is to actually create a skin these days with SkinStudio with a video tutorial of how to do it and some tips and tricks on how to make your skin more reliable and compatible on people's computers.

We also have a preview of ObjectBar 2 coming up along with ObjectDock Plus, BootSkin Plus (true color version), and more.

Stay tuned!

Take your system to the next level with Object Desktop! Winner of the 2004 PC Magazine Editor's Choice Award for Best Utility of its kind. [Object Desktop]

 

 

 

Windows Media 9 Series Player

 

How to make more robust visual styles

Published on Wednesday, May 19, 2004 By Brad Wardell In WinCustomize Talk



A lot of skins, if not most skins, don't set the caption height.

WindowBlinds only paints in the areas it has reserved from the OS which is the height of the title bar for instance.  But Windows itself will paint anywhere between teh size of the title bar and the caption height.

That is why it's important for skin authors to enter in the caption height (being the height of their title bar) into SkinStudio so that they make their skins.

A lot of the entries in the GUI Olympics don't have this set. The screenshot shown here is how it should be set (I correct them on my system as I go along).

What happens is that you end up with weird drawing aroudn borders, the "Classic" title bar will show up in MDI windows and in other title bars, and things can get sized funny.

You can also fix this yourself if you download a skin just by downloading SkinStudio (www.skinstudio.net) and going to the section shown in here and changing the caption height to be the same height as the title bar (example: 23 pixels).

If you've submitted something to the GUI Olympics, feel free to update your skin.

New York, 2008, nuclear terrorism

Published on Wednesday, May 19, 2004 By Brad Wardell In Politics

Some months ago I wrote an article outlining why I thought that it was important that the middle east solve their terrorist problem themselves. 

Let me postulate one example reason why. Imagine this scenario:

New York, Fall, 2008. A suicide bomber team has smuggled into the United States a crude 8 kiloton nuclear device. Assembled in lower New Jersey, the team rents a boat and brings it into New York harbor and sets it off. The destruction kills 47,000 people and destroys much of Manhattan.

It turns out that the fissionable material came from Iran from its illicit nuclear weapons program (but not sanctioned by Iran). The terrorist organization responsible, Al Qaeda, declares responsibility and is operating largely in the no-man's land between Afghanistan and Pakistan along with certain outlying areas in Iran.

Thousands march in support of this action in Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Syria, and the west bank.

What do you think the reaction of the United States be?

Fix your own problems so we don't have to..

Published on Wednesday, May 19, 2004 By Brad Wardell In Current Events

Those who fear and loathe the US "hyperpower" meddling in the affairs of the middle east and elsewhere should consider a radical, alternative approach: Clean up their own messes.

The US, being a democracy, is representative of the will of its people. Americans don't want to be in the middle east. But we feel we have no other choice -- people from that part of the world keep doing everything that can to murder as many of us as possible. And their *stated* reasons (as opposed to imagined reasons invented by anti-american left wingers) are nonsensical and ridiculous.

So the radical plan would involve this: The people of the middle east getting rid of the terrorists within their borders themselves. You don't have American citizens individually running aroung the world commiting terrorist acts. You don't think some of the victims of 9/11 would feel a little justified giong over to say Saudi Arabia and taking out his or her revenge?  We don't do that because we actively discourage that kind of behavior.

Perhaps the people of the middle east, instead of blaming the west in general or the United States specifically should instead look inward and clean up their own mess. Get rid of their despotic rulers. Stop tolerating the death cults around them. Stop applauding terrorist acts. Feel some outrage when someone cuts the head off an innocent civilian in the name of their religion. And just in general, clean up their act.

Because if they don't, sooner or later, someone else will.