Brad Wardell's Blog


My friends are liberals

Published on Sunday, December 23, 2007 By Brad Wardell In Blogging

I have a confession to make. I generally enjoy the company of left-wingers to right-wingers. It's true.  I love to have lively debates but the main observation I have about left-wingers is that they tend to at least think about things more so than the average person.  Sure, most of their opinions are poorly thought out (grin) but I enjoy talking to people who have thought about more than what they've eaten today, what they hope to eat tomorrow, and what they've eaten in the past which seems an increasingly common topic with people as I get older.

When you get together with your families this week for Christmas, observe how much of the conversation focuses around tactical living issues (food, clothing, shelter, children). You may find it depressing. 

That isn't to say that left wingers in general make interesting friends. There are plenty of left wingers who simply hate Bush for no particular reason.  And if pressed get into mindless regurgitation (Haliburton, Iraq, Big Oil, Kyoto).  But as a broad generalization, I just find talking to left wingers slightly more interesting.  Though admittedly, many left wingers don't like their beliefs held up to scrutiny and get physically angry at the idea that people might disagree with them (global warming being a particular topic that will set some left wingers off).

In my family, the left right spectrum is pretty evenly split. We've got people who make Col Gene look like a libertarian and people who make Gideon look like a communist.  It's all over the board which makes family get togethers lively with a common phrase being "How can someone as educated as you believe that X is true?"

And I'm the dumb one in my family.

Brad's highlighted pictures of 2007

Published on Sunday, December 23, 2007 By Brad Wardell In Blogging

 

Here are some pictures from this past year!

IMG_4463 img_0366 brad-fall2007 

 ashleydaddy-thanks2007 ChristmasPic IMG_0036 IMG_0156 IMG_0161 IMG_4419  IMG_4560 IMG_4789 IMG_4715 IMG_4707 IMG_4969 IMG_5074 img_0344 img_0274 IMG_0221

 

Captioning: My turtle Cuddles who celebrated his 20th year living with me this year. Ashley on the tramponline. Take a close look at the "family picture"... The toy in the garage at the cottage. Debbie in New York. Alex at Comerica Park. Stupid me and my stinging bees. My hot wife poses in the car. Ryan gets a base hit. Alex tries to crawl away on our beach. More bees. More shots of my beautiful Debbie.

Is MyColors the future of mainstream skinning?

Published on Sunday, December 23, 2007 By Brad Wardell In OS Customization

For years I've read how two big problems have kept skinning from becoming truly mainstream.

The first problem was that the myriad of programs necessary to get adequate results was too complicated, too unreliable, too bloated, and too hard to keep up to date.

The second problem was that actually getting quality themes was too difficult, that even after people managed to get the combination of WindowBlinds, IconPackager, and other such programs cobbled together that it took too much effort to find stuff they liked.

And that's why I wonder if MyColors is going to be the future of skinning in the mainstream?

Right now, a user can buy Object Desktop for 50 bucks or so and has access to thousands and thousands of skins and themes out there to choose from.  But many feel that only power users can navigate the maze of software updates and skin galleries to get something put together that's good.

By contrast, MyColors works in the opposite direction - the software is free but the themes cost money instead. And the software automatically self-updates.

Here is a screenshot of the latest internal MyColors build:

image

The user opens up MyColors and the software detects if something has been updated, updates itself and voila, new version. No worrying about versions.

Moreover, if a given theme has been updated, the theme automatically updates (the apply button changes to update).

image

For example, I have the "beta" of the Chicago Bulls NBA theme installed. But the final version was released so it changes to saying:

image

When I click on it, the user interface isn't interrupted with some obnoxious dialog downloading the update. Instead, it's subtle and multithreaded:

image

The theme listed simply changes slightly with the % download complete. The rest of the program is still usable to apply a different suite.

Then when applied you get something like this:

image

Where the icons, wallpaper, and of course user interface reflects the new theme.  One can imagine this expanding over time to include animated wallpapers and logons and boot screens and such to provide absolutely complete experiences.

When someone wants to check out more they just click on "More themes and see"

image

Which lets them browse hundreds of premium suites.

Stardock's concern has been making sure that it ensures existing customers can benefit from this massive undertaking.  After all, to create these hundreds of suites (MyColors themes) Stardock hired a significant portion of the skinning community as full time professional artists (SkinPlant and Pixutdio now are all part of Stardock Design along with Essorant, VStyler, Pixel Pirate, Voo, and others). 

So in 2008, Object Desktop users will simply get MyColors along with some free inspirational themes as part of their subscription.

Which reminds me, another really cool thing is that the program automatically knows what themes you have rights to.  One annoying thing about the premium suites of the past is that if I reinstalled or something, I had to manually go and get themes. MyColors simply lists them all for download once it knows who you are. More themes are added just by putting in a serial # and it will grab that too within the program. No links. No special instructions.

We expect that within the next 5 years, most PCs will come with this kind of capability in some form.  As long as the quality and usability is there, people will want the ability to personalize their PCs just as they do everything else.

ThinkPad as development machine

Published on Sunday, December 23, 2007 By Brad Wardell In GalCiv Journals

For the first time ever, my main desktop machine is also a laptop. I never thought that day would come.

For the past 3 years, my desktop PC has been what I thought as a very powerful Pentium 4 based Dell XPS system.  But after getting a new ThinkPad T61 laptop, I did some benchmarks and discovered that the ThinkPad was substantially faster than the Dell (other than in the hard drive area where both are roughly equal).

During the holiday, I plan to work on computer AI in Galactic Civilizations and today I got the laptop set up with all the various development tools to get going on that. It's the first time I've coded on Windows Vista so it should be quite interesting to see how that works out.

Brad's Nightstand: December 2007

Published on Sunday, December 23, 2007 By Brad Wardell In Entertainment

I always plan to do little reviews on the books I read.  Unfortunately, time usually prevents me and still prevents me.  I tend to read a lot of magazines (US News and World Report, Games for Windows, PC Gamer, eWeek, Information Week, Entertainment Weekly even) and of course masses of on-line stuff.

But at night, when I'm starting to wind down, I like to read books. In a given week I'll typically read about 2 books. When things at work aren't stressful, I'll read closer to 3 depending on the size of the book.

Here's a picture of the nightstand in our room from tonight (my wife wants to straighten up for Christmas company):

IMG_0575

Some of this I've read before and am just reading for comfort (Dune books, Watchmen, Feist).

I just finished reading Ann Coulter's new book. I'm struggling through "Power to the People" by Laura Ingraham. Her writing style is just not entertaining even though she's probably my favorite TV commentator (though Michelle Malkin is right up there).

The book "How Things Works" sucks and was a big disappointment. 

I just started the books on the bottom shelf this past week. I'm thinking of holding off on The World is Flat for my CES trip as it looks very entertaining and might make a good inflight book.

Right now, I'm in a holding pattern to see if anyone got me any books for Christmas (I usually don't get any books for Christmas ironically) and then will go on a mini spree to stock up for the next couple of months. There's a new Star Wars novel (Fury I think it is). There's also a longevity book I want to get.

I'll try to post these pictures every couple of months going forward if people are interested.

Are you a gifted person?

Published on Sunday, December 23, 2007 By Brad Wardell In Blogging

 

If you have 75% of the below attributes (and be honest) you are probably a gifted person.

[ ] Are you a good problem solver?
[ ] Can you concentrate for long periods of time?
[ ] Are you a perfectionist?
[ ] Do you persevere with your interests?
[ ] Are you an avid reader?
[ ] Do you have a vivid imagination?
[ ] Do you enjoy doing jigsaw puzzles?
[ ] Often connect seemingly unrelated ideas?
[ ] Do you enjoy paradoxes?
[ ] Do you set high standards for yourself?
[ ] Do you have a good long-term memory?
[ ] Are you deeply compassionate?
[ ] Do you have persistent curiosity?
[ ] Do you have a good sense of humor?
[ ] Are you a keen observer?
[ ] Do you love mathematics?
[ ] Do you need periods of contemplation?
[ ] Do you search for meaning in your life?
[ ] Are you aware of things that others are not?
[ ] Are you fascinated by words?
[ ] Are you highly sensitive?
[ ] Do you have strong moral convictions?
[ ] Do you often feel out-of-sync with others?
[ ] Are you perceptive or insightful?
[ ] Do you often question rules or authority?
[ ] Do you have organized collections?
[ ] Do you thrive on challenge?
[ ] Do you have extraordinary abilities and deficits?
[ ] Do you learn new things rapidly?
[ ] Feel overwhelmed by many interests/abilities?
[ ] Do you have a great deal of energy?
[ ] Often take a stand against injustice?
[ ] Do you feel driven by your creativity?
[ ] Love ideas and ardent discussion?
[ ] Did you have developmentally advanced childhood?
[ ] Have unusual ideas or perceptions?
[ ] Are you a complex person?

Now, before you answer these, be honest.  I've asked people some of these questions and they say "Oh yea, I love to read" and then I ask "What was the last book you read?" and I get an answer from months ago.  If you use "I don't have time to do X but I still love to do X" then the answer is, no, you don't love to do X. You may LIKE to do X but if you "love it" you have time.

The Politically Incorrect Guide series

Published on Sunday, December 23, 2007 By Brad Wardell In Politics

http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_ss_b/002-0593763-7135257?url=search-alias%3Dstripbooks&field-keywords=The+Politically+INcorrect+Guide+to

There's some interesting books coming out of this series in which the authors defend some of the minority views on different issues.

The problem I'm having with the series is that even on issues I agree with, some of their arguments are really weak or (in my opinion) deceptive. Thus, I lose faith in the parts that I'm not as familiar with.

For instance, The Politically Incorrect Guide to global warming is interesting and as a skeptic of human produced CO2 caused global warming I'm sympathetic to the author's arguments. But I know that many of the arguments in the book are pretty iffy.

It gets much worse in another book in the series regarding Intelligent Design.  Look, Intelligent Design is not a theory. It's a hypothesis that simply says "This is all too complicated to have happened on its own therefore a magical super being must have done it." It's nonsense and most of the arguments it makes simply factually incorrect.

It's because of that that I am not likely to purchase the other books in the series, especially one issues that I agree with the premises of the book. I don't want to find myself regurgitating poorly researched data to other people.

I like to think that my opinions on issues are based on a rational exploration of the issue by learning as much on it as I can and then forming said opinion.  But if I can't trust the source on details I'm already knowledgeable on, I don't want to trust to the source on data I'm not familiar on.

I love Amazon.com

Published on Sunday, December 23, 2007 By Brad Wardell In Blogging

If I could imagine the perfect on-line retailer it would have to be Amazon.com.  The only thing they're missing is some sort of iTunes-like manager for going through the store more quickly and making purchasing and getting to information better.

I find that even if I don't buy anything, the site is still incredibly interesting purely as a community.

2008 Porsche 911 Turbo Review

Published on Sunday, December 23, 2007 By Brad Wardell In Car Reviews

I don't know about you but when I read car reviews in most car magazines I have to resist the urge to tear my eyes out. The reviews are so filled with a combination of over the top drooling or over the top petty contempt. 

I remember reading a review of the 2007 Porsche 911 Turbo in which the reviewer said the car didn't have enough animal passion.  What the hell does that mean?

So this year, I bought a Porsche 911 Turbo.  I've always wanted one but never thought I'd be able to get one, especially a new one.  15 years ago I was driving a 1984 Chevette.  Needless to say, I have a real appreciation for the quality differences in cars at different price levels.

I'm going to break this down into 4 categories:

  1. Exterior
  2. Performance and Handling
  3. Interior
  4. Overall

Exterior

Porsche 911s have a distinct look. It's one of the reasons why people get them. They just look awesome.  I had the opportunity to try out an Audi R8 and it's a great car but when you see it in person, the exterior just looks a bit odd.  The 911 Turbo just says class.

Performance and Handling

This is why you get a Porsche 911 Turbo right?  The performance is, of course, insane. The rated 0 to 60 is around 3.7 seconds. Good drivers can get it to 3.5 and some magazines have done it in 3.4.  I doubt I can do it in less than 4 seconds personally.  I'm just not good enough on a stick.  The Tiptronic (automatic) is supposedly slightly faster but on a sports car, I just prefer a stick.

It's not just how fast it goes, it's the handling. I've never driven a car that comes close to the kind of handling this car has.  It's just unbelievable how this car maneuvers.

That said, I find myself driving it slower than my "day car" the Jaguar S-type R. That's because the Jag is so sound proofed that you can be going very fast without feeling it.  In the Porsche, you know you're going fast. That awareness makes me drive it a bit slower.

Interior

The interior is where the Porsche does not shine. Technologically, the Porsche 911 Turbo for 2008 is primitive.  I can deal with not having an iPod interface but it doesn't even including an Aux input. There's no included Blue Tooth connection for cell phones. The GPS unit is crummy. The key has a tendency to unlock the door if it's in your pocket (the unlock/lock button is a freaking toggle button!). There's no options for remote start or anything resembling that.

It does, however, have a back seat that people can sit in for short amounts of time. This is actually a bit of a big deal in a pinch as well as for taking stuff with you.

The front trunk is kind of cool but relatively small.

But overall, I'd say the 911 Turbo's interior is unacceptably poor for a car of this price range. In addition, Porsche fanatics tend to scream that it's a sports car and shouldn't have those amenities. Please. The purists can get a GT2 or GT3 or whatever. The Turbo is supposed to be their super car that has a bit of everything.

Overall

Overall it's an awesome car. I might gripe about the interior but you don't buy a Porsche 911 Turbo so that you can have a nice touch screen GPS and there are plenty of after market solutions to deal with that. 

I love the 911 Turbo because it is a super car that still is somewhat practical. With its all-wheel drive and smart design, you can use this car as (gasp) a car. It's not just an expensive "look at me" toy like a Lamborghini or to a lesser extent a Ferrari.

Here are some pictures of it before the weather got nasty:

IMG_5081 IMG_5082 IMG_5083

Politically Incorrect Entrepreneurs

Published on Sunday, December 23, 2007 By Brad Wardell In Blogging

Dilbert author, Scott Adams, recently announced he would be blogging less and would no longer post about controversial topics. 

His rationale was that blogging produced little in tangible income but negative reaction to his controversial blogs had the potential to tangibly decrease his income from lost readership.

I can relate to that. I often will get an email from someone saying they'll never buy a product I'm associated with because I've offended them with one of my blogs.

But at the same time, I support people's right to talk with their dollars. If someone chooses not to read Dilbert anymore or buy something I make because we offended that person, that's their right.

To be clear: I think it's their right. I also think that the threshold for this sort of thing falls into the realm of idiocy pretty quickly.

There is a big difference, for instance, between a Hollywood celebrity making clueless remarks on politics that gets covered in the general media and someone posting on their own site. 

On the one hand, we create the celebrities in the first place and when they abuse their celebrity by making political statements designed to get media coverage then there's an inherent desire for people to reduce that person's celebrity.

By contrast, when I write about how I want to eat baby seals, I am writing it on my own blog that people voluntarily come and visit. Someone's voluntary purchase of some product I was involved in did not get redirected into having my views forced upon the world. 

Similarly, Scott Adams isn't using his fame to espouse particular points of view. He is writing it on his Typepad.com blog that people choose to visit.

That's why I don't have a problem with Rosie O'Donald posting on her blog site but had a big problem with her espousing her political opinions on The View.

If I started putting my controversial opinions into my products, then that would be pretty obnoxious.  But I don't do that.  I don't think Scott Adams does that either.

In short, I support someone's right to boycott a product because of the views of the creator but there's also a pretty good chance that the boycotter is an idiot who no one would want as a customer anyway.