Brad Wardell's Blog


Nerf babies in World of Warcraft

Published on Sunday, December 26, 2004 By Brad Wardell In PC Gaming

Gad I get tired of seeing calls for nerfing based on the experience of PvP players.

I play as a Paladin and I can see where in a straight up dual that a Paladin would be tough to kill. But most of those Paladin powers are usable only once in a long while (lay on hands is good once per hour for instance). 

Just annoys me to think that the PvP players might be able to get their "nerf" requests taken seriously based on something as artificial as a pre-arranged duel.  Most of the time I'm running around half my Paladin powers are re-charging and unavailable. And at that point, I've got relatively low DPS compared to a warrior.

There are far more "unbalanced" things in WoW than Paladins and I don't think most of those need to be fixed either.

Typical conversation with a PvP:

PvP: "Yea, those Paladins are totally out of control man, it's totally unfair."

PvP2: "Dude you are so right. They get a gazillion lives and advantages others don't get."

PvP: "Damn straight. BTW, here's that enchanted Battle Axe of Glory +30 strength that Harvey from the Guild found last night by using Thotbot to keep killing that elite Drake over and over last night since he doesn't have a life.  Normally you have to be a level 55 guy to even get into that area alive and you're only a level 20 but the axe only requires level 20 to use. So here you go. Go bash that damn Paladin, he's only got a regular Stone hammer. Them the breaks for not belonging to a l33t guild like ours.."

In other words, before complaining about "nerfing" the Paladin because he can heal himself or something let's keep some perspective. In terms of player imbalance, guilds and such are far more unbalancing on a day to day basis than any healing power.

Personal Pages open to more people...

Published on Sunday, December 26, 2004 By Brad Wardell In WinCustomize News

We have extended the number of people who can create personal pages.  Before only WinCustomize subscribers could create personal pages.  Now, Active Stardock customers can as well (if you have an active Object Desktop.net subscription or purchased a Stardock product in the past year).

Your personal pages allow you to have a home page here on WinCustomize complete with your own sub-domain.  We will be adding even more features to them in the next few weeks such as personal photo albums, custom HTML areas, and more.

Here's mine: http://frogboy.wincustomize.com

v1.1 news

Published on Sunday, December 26, 2004 By Brad Wardell In Political Machine
Assuming we get Ubi Soft's okay, we hope to have a v1.1 in January that has some additional candidates and updated issues and some other tweaks along the way.

What's next for Google?

Published on Sunday, December 26, 2004 By Brad Wardell In Google

Do you know why we love the computer industry? Because only in the computer industry do we get to have hard core smack downs.  It's one big industry video game where Microsoft has to fight off various "bosses" as it climbs the ladder to tougher and tougher opponents:

Microsoft vs. IBM

Microsoft vs. Netscape

Microsoft vs. AOL

and now..

Microsoft vs. Google

Each time, the opponent is tougher, more seasoned and each time the restraints on Microsoft greater.  And Google is smart.  From the very start Google has been about the smartest, most clever company I've seen on the net. Almost all their ideas are brillian.  Clever search engine. Text ads, you name it, it's all been done with incredible intelligence. 

So can Microsoft's new search engine beat it out? I have my doubts. I've been trying out MSN Search and it doesn't compare at this point.  Here's a simple search: "Brad Wardell".  On MSN Search I get some interview on a gaming site as the # 1 pick. On Google I get my blog page. So whatever algorithm Microsoft is using, it hasn't quite come together yet.

And so far, Google has been benevolent.  The power that Google has is frightening. They could flatten almost any net based business (including ours) just by changing their algorithm a bit to push us off the first page on a number of things. Even as it their use of open directory, which is incredibly outdated, is a source of frustration to us.

So what's next for Google? Check out this article on Technology Review for a very lengthy and thorough analysis...

Industry Watchers: Don't Think Microsoft Is Down for the Count

Published on Sunday, December 26, 2004 By Brad Wardell In Microsoft

Just because Microsoft has said it will comply immediately with a European Court judge's order to follow specified antitrust remedies doesn't mean life will be a bowl of cherries for Microsoft's partners, developers and even its competitors.

Industry watchers said they will be watching exactly how Microsoft makes good on the court-ordered removal of Windows Media Player from its Windows desktop operating system, and its publishing of communications protocols designed to make Windows better communicate with competitors' products.

Microsoft-Watch.com has a full article on the the repricussions of the EU decision to force Microsoft to pull its Media Player from the base OS. Including this quote:

"Forcing Microsoft to unbundled Windows Media Player is a bad decision for consumers," said Brad Wardell, president and CEO of Stardock Corp., a Windows software developer. "The universal availability of a capable media player as part of the OS enables software developers, consumers, and media professionals to make certain assumptions about what they can put into their software, make use of on a website, or distribute on the Internet."

Wardell said it will be crucial to see what kinds of underlying media technologies and files, rather than simply Windows Media Player itself, Microsoft unbundles from Windows.

"There's a lot of 'stuff' that Windows Media Player includes with it that developers routinely make use of to create things like inter-office radio, media streaming, etc. Developers like us put up .WMV files onto our websites as tutorials about our software because we can assume that Windows XP users have Windows Media Player," Wardell said.

Read the whole thing at Microsoft-Watch.com.

Editorial: That isn't to say that I think Microsoft should be able to toss anything they want into the OS. They are a monopoly. However, the courts need to weigh the pros and cons of these things more carefully. Having a basic ability to play music and video as part of the OS is different than throwing in anti-virus or Internet search.

Will Apple flash iPod rock market?

Published on Sunday, December 26, 2004 By Brad Wardell In iPod

Apple appears to be preparing to release a flash memory version of the iPod.  The iPod is a media player device that has historically used micro-hard drives in their devices. The typical iPod has 20 gigabytes of space on it with the mini-iPod having 4 gigabytes (that's what I have).

A flash based iPod would likely make it smaller and lighter.

Apple was also not the first to offer hard-drive-based players when it debuted the first iPod in October 2001, but it now commands the lion's share of that market. In the U.S. retail market, the iPod accounted for more than 80 percent of sales in the 12 months ended this October, according to The NPD Group. That's up from about two-thirds market share in the same period a year ago and a 40 percent share in its first year.

Read the whole thing.

Are you a Christmas lamer?

Published on Friday, December 24, 2004 By Brad Wardell In Home & Family

And so on this Christmas eve I share with you all my own narrow judgmental take on how life should be. Today's topic, lame people on Christmas.

Are you a Christmas lamer? Here are the signs:

10) You didn't send Christmas cards out this year.

9) You did send Christmas cards out but as emails.

8) You justified 9 or 10 because you were "so busy" this year (as opposed to everyone else)

7) Your "Christmas shopping" consisted of going to one big store (ala Target or Walmart or something) and buying all the gifts on your list in one swoop within a week or so of Christmas.

6) You have uttered the words "This time of year is so stressful" even once.

5) You gave "gift cards" as your primary gift to multiple people.

4) You suggested "drawing names" to get out of buying presents for your family.

3) You used the excuse "they are too hard to shop for" to justify why you waited until Christmas eve to shop for them and then purchased something really impersonal.

2) You had your wife or secretary do most of your Christmas shopping for you (including the gifts for them). Ahem.

1) You admit to doing these lame things but try to rationalize and justify your actions. If you're lame, like me, embrace it. Don't weasel out of your lameness. Either stop being lame or admit to being lame.

If you are a Christmas lamer, do something about it. Don't be lame. Or if you are lame, admit that you're lame. That's the first step. Unfortunately for me, that's not the last step...