Brad Wardell's Blog


Blogging on JoeUser.com

Published on Saturday, February 7, 2004 By Brad Wardell In WinCustomize News

Ever wanted to have your own web site with your name as part of the domain? A place specifically deisgned to make it easy for you to write articles, blogs, etc. about anything you want.

That's what JoeUser.com is set up for. And if you have an account here on WinCustomize, you have one on JoeUser too.

We are currently testing out an updated blogging feature that we're not sure how well it works yet.

We are looking for some volunteers to go over to https://www.joeuser.com and create a blog and make sure they are able to do so (and then let us know here). We are also looking for people to give us feedback on how easy (or hard) the process was for them.

Thanks!

The state of JoeUser: Feb 2004

Published on Saturday, February 7, 2004 By Brad Wardell In Blogging

JoeUser is growing in leaps and bounds. A month ago the average number of people on the site might be around 30 people. These days it's typically around 80 people at the same time with it being 175 as I type this. So things are going pretty well. Of course, we've also had a of technical glitches as the site has grown, we've had to make adjustments as we've started gaining unwanted attention from hackers, griefers, and other undesirables.  If you've had problems posting articles to your blog in the last couple of days, that's been the cause -- us adding features in a hurry to combat these types.

Addressing Hackers & Griefers

So now the site is more secure, your blogs are backed up very regularly to a remote machine in case of catastrophic failure, and we have the ability to ban people. Pat and I (T-man) became friends 15 years ago. We ran BBSes in those days. Since that time we've built many net communities. The largest one we've put together is called WinCustomize.com which gets over 2 million users per month.  With JoeUser, myself, Pat, and his team (DarkStar and Flying Hawaian) have put what we've learned in that time into this site.  So the banning feature here is pretty cool in how it technically functions (it's based on IP addresses and other things I won't get into to help make it hard for someone to come back as someone else).  We hope to add less severe penalties and checks and balances to the system over time so that people can get a second chance if they misbehave.

Blog Navigator

In the next week or so we plan to release Blog Navigator. Blog Navigator is a program designed to read JoeUser like a news reader. It's still in the relative early stages but it is pretty slick. It'll be free to view JoeUser but will have some cost (probably $19.95 or something) to add non-JoeUser sites to browse through. There are RSS readers out there, some of which are free, that are reasonably nice but our goal is to make Blog Navigator so slick and useful that it'll be worth it.

Premium Accounts

Creating a blog on JoeUser is free. Eventually though we plan to put in place a way for people to pay a nominal fee in exchange for being able to upload images and other things to their blog.  Over time we'll be adding services that will be available to premium accounts to make blogging easier. One feature is that Blog Navigator will be able to eventually download your blog to your machine so that you have it all locally whenever you want. I don't know about you guys but I want to have 5 years of my blogs on some remote machine. I want a way to have it backed up myself locally. And that is something we will be doing in the coming months.

New Features for JoeUser itself

Some features coming up include the ability to enter in more information about yourself if you choose. We are going to "force" every user to enter in their age as we really need to start differentiating between adult users and minors given some of the content that has come up. Similarly, authors will be able to check a "Adult content" checkbox when they make an article so that children won't be able to see the article. It won't be full proof by any means but it's better than what we currently have (nothing).

The re-organization of the forums is nearly complete. Next week we'll be consolidating some of the top level categories.  For instance, instead of Books, Movies, TV, etc. It'll all fall under the Entertainment category with those sections becoming topics of Entertainment. That way there won't be so many different categories to sift through.

We will also be adding the ability for authors to decide whether people can comment on their article. The option will say: "Comments on your article? [] Anyone, []Registered users only, []No one.  So someone who wants to just write their blog without any comments will have that right. Or if they want to make it so that only people who have accounts can respond that's good too.

We will also be adding features to let you upload a picture of yourself and of your desktop. The personal information you choose to enter can optionally be made available as part of your profile.  Here's a simple version of what we're thinking of from The Political Machine. It's not done yet but you can get the idea: https://www.politicalmachine.com/infoLite.asp?ID=879148.

Advocates

One feature deserves its own sub-heading : Advocates. As some of you no-doubt have noticed, we don't get many referrals from other blog sites or anywhere for that matter.  What makes blogs special, IMO anyway, is that they are part of a larger community. We need to become more integrated with the rest of the blogsphere which will help your articles reach more viewers. The way to do that will be by becoming an advocate.  Since we track referrals, we could give points to users who are associated with a particular site.

The way it works is that a user registers a given website with the advocate system. Then, whenever that site sends a referral to JoeUser that user will get a fraction of a point. We will also have a top advocates list as well to highlight those users.  It's a good way to encourage users to exchange links with other blogs and sites elsewhere (called blog rolling) as well as give recognition to those who are the best at evangelizing their blog (the link doesn't have to be to www.joeuser.com, it can be to your specific blog). 

So in my case, I could register www.wincustomize.com as a site and then every time they send a link here I'd get a fraction of a point. Now, most people don't have such an easy advantage since I can add links to both sites.

As for me...

I'm going to not be commenting nearly as much on other people's blogs. I don't want to discourage anyone from writing and having the owner of the site jumping on someone's article disagreeing with them might be a bit overwhelming. So I'll keep my hands off until you get into the top 10 or so in general.  

It has been a real adjustment for me opening my blog site to the public to have their own blogs. Particularly because many of the articles people post are "debate" type topics. I belong to many mailing lists that essentially are for "expert" debaters to hash our various issues. I confess to becoming frustrated interacting with people who are new to on-line debating. For instance, my area of "expertise" in on-line debating is history. History is my #1 hobby and through reading of history you can eventually get a clearer picture about why things are they way they are (for example, some people act like the war in terror is in chaos because the US attacked Iraq even though it had nothing to do with 9/11.  The first nation whose territory we violated with troops after Pearl Harbor was France -- we invaded French North Africa in operation Torch. Needless to say, critics of the administration at the time didn't see what French North Africa or even Rommel had to do with Pearl Harbor, especially with the Philippines occupied by the Japanese).  So I tend to be short in patience when people think that any events occurring now are somehow unprecedented or articles that show a distinct lack of knowledge on history despite asserting a certain level of certainty about what happened.  So I'll be cutting down on the responses.

But I will be making more articles though.  I have a bunch nearly done. Many article just take a long time to do because of the research involved. Which is probably another reason I tend to get impatient with articles that just spew out what I consider to be regurgitated propaganda from either the left wing or the right wing on some issue.  For instance, it's amazing how many people, including "journalists" slam on Haliburton. I wonder how many people actually know what this company does? Or that it actually made more money under Clinton?  Like many things, finding these things out is just a few clicks away but it's easier for people to just parrot, unwittingly, talking points from some political operative as if they are fact.

But that's the type of stuff I enjoy writing about -- things that many people may not have heard of before. Some people may find it "bomb throwing" but that's not the intent. It's just that I choose topics sometimes that are so against the prevailing (and often ill-informed) views of the day. Seriously, how many people out there that you meet on a day to day basis would know that it was the Republicans who fought tooth and nail in congress and in state legislatures to abolish slavery (passing the 13th amendment) while Democrats fought tooth and nail to keep slavery going. That until around 1965, the Democrats were generally the party of "white power" in ways that would make either side cringe today? The whole slapping Republicans with the racist tag is so amazingly offensive to me because it shows a complete lack of knowledge on history. Republicans just don't like special treatment based on pigment. That's about the biggest thing that can be thrown on them. The people who created and supported separate but equal were Democrats. The people who created the Jim Crowe laws were Democrats.  Just another example of how goofed up current events can get if history is ignored. 

Not that Republicans should start feeling high and mighty. The reason why Republicans are stereotyped as being uncaring of the less fortunate is because so many of them are uncaring of the less fortunate. I've seen it first hand so many times. What Republicans need to realize is that while there are many poor people who just leech of the system, the majority of poor people are hard working Americans just trying to make ends meet. And Republicans need to start taking white collar crime much more seriously. In the 10 years I've been in business, I've had around $600,000 stolen from me. Did anyone go to jail? Nope. Did the police even get involved? Nope. Because in the business world, you can be an amazingly dishonest crook and steal all you want. My first publisher stole an estimated $150,000 from me. I was a college student at the time, what could I do? He just didn't pay royalties. Not a cent after the product's release. It was as simple as that. He got money and just didn't pay any. And my experience is sadly, typical.  If Republicans want to get taken more seriously about their complaining about the taxes "wasted" each year on the less fortunate they need to start pushing for criminal penalties in financial contract violations and the like. You can set up a LLC corporation in a few days, put together a contract with people to sell their stuff, get the money and then declare bankruptcy without ever paying. Is that right? No. Ever hear Republicans talk about how we need to stop the hundreds of billions of dollars lost each year due to white collar crime? Nope. And who really gets screwed at the end of the day? Working Americans.

What's next

So as the site gets more popular, you'll see a lot of interesting articles and such. You'll also see commercialism creep in as at some point we'll have to find a way to pay for this monstrosity. We will keep blogs free though (though we may require at some point that to use technical support you'll need to get a premium membership).

It's been fun and it's getting funner and more and more personalities enter the site. I'm really glad to see that the site isn't dominated by any ideologies. Of the top 10 you have one right of center blogger (me) and a couple left of center bloggers. So it's reasonably evened out overall.  We want to make sure JoeUser is a reasonably neutral place for people to write about whatever they want.

Have fun!

Election 2004 early prediction

Published on Friday, February 6, 2004 By Brad Wardell In Politics

It's probably a little early but this is my quickie prediction of what the next election will go like barring some unforeseen turn of events. Red are Bush states, blue are Kerry states.

Prediction: Kerry chooses Edwards as his running mate.

Bad idea potential 1: Kerry chooses Gephardt

What Kerry should have done: Kerry should pick Bob Graham of Florida as his VP.

The key states of this election: Florida, Pennsylvania.

Tom Ridge of Pennsylvania gives Bush enough of a chance to win there but this is the one state I am least confident of.  If Kerry chooses Graham as his VP choice then Florida could go his way giving him the election but I am thinking he'll choose Edwards.

States that aren't really in play despite pundits claims: Michigan, Illinois.

We'll see. It's going to be very close either way. A lot of states are locked up by both sides right away.

Stay tuned for updates as time goes on to see how things change. 5 states are so close that they could go either way changing the entire election.

Call for help wallpaper!

Published on Thursday, February 5, 2004 By Brad Wardell In WinCustomize News
WindowBlinds will be on TechTV's Call For Help tomorrow! If you're a fan of the show, be sure to download the Call For Help wallpaper, created by Paul Boyer who creates wallpapers and icons for TechTV and is an admin here on WinCustomize.com.

Widgets arrive for DesktopX

Published on Thursday, February 5, 2004 By Brad Wardell In DesktopX

We're getting the finishing touches on DesktopX 2.1 out there. It's pretty exciting all the new things you can do with it. And finally it's pretty clear what the advantage are the different versions are:

When exporting an object you now have 3 options, two of which are new. 

The first option is to export it as a packaged object. That's been around since day 1 and isn't new. Packaged objects are what people upload to WinCustomize.

The second option is brand new with DesktopX 2.1. You can export your object as a program (.exe) that uses DesktopX as its run time. These are called widgets. You don't have to have DesktopX running to use widgets. You just have to have it installed on your system in order to make use of the DLLs it adds to your system. Loading a widget is just like running any other program except you have to first have DesktopX installed somewhere. This option requires the enhanced version of DesktopX 2.1 though (either via Object Desktop or on its own).

The third option is from DesktopX Pro and is for software developers. It lets you export the object as a stand-alone program. Literally a single EXE is created that you can give to anyone. No support DLLs at all. Just the EXE which does it all. What's really amazing is how small the EXE is. The overhead is only a few hunded K space wise (this is where a huge amount of effort went in -- to make sure that these stand alone programs would be small and tight). DesktopX Pro, however, is $499 ($129 for non-commercial use). If you are thinking "$129? $499 woha that's too much" you're not the target audience then. You would definitely not want to hear about DesktopX Enterprise which we sell for $10k to $30k depending on the licensing options.

I am using DesktopX Pro here and having a blast making goodies with it. Here's one I made tonight:

That's my son Ryan.  It's actually configurable within the object (see the little button in the bottom right?). So I export this as a stand alone program and send it off to the grand parents. I'm so cool.

Here's the DesktopX home page: http://www.desktopx.net

DesktopX 2.1 will be out next week. You can buy it now and you'll get 2.1 next week. The Pro version can be found here: http://www.desktopx.net/pro.asp

 

Samurize 1.20

Published on Thursday, February 5, 2004 By Brad Wardell In WinCustomize News

Bugfixes:

* fixed PNG Meter image path bug

* "Track Resolution Changes" option removed (it wasn't helping)

Improvements:

* Updated media plugins (kudos to Tropics)

* Improved vertical taskbar support

* Default tab size increased

* WindowsXP Look & Feel for Config Editor

* Improved readme/installer

* Multiple server instances allowed with different output settings

* Configs can be organized in subfolders of the Samurize/Configs folder

New Features:

* Choose-Your-Own Tray Icon

* Play sounds/perform commands on alert conditions

* Line graphic object

* Peaks for most meter types

* Alert conditions for PNG Image Meters

* Snap to screen edge option for Client

* Word wrapping for Text meters

New chemical element found: Governmentium

Published on Thursday, February 5, 2004 By Brad Wardell In Humor
This is making its way around the net...

New Chemical Element Discovered Called "Governmentium"

A major research institution has recently announced the discovery of the heaviest chemical element yet known to science. The new element has been named "Governmentium."

Governmentium has 1 neutron, 12 assistant neutrons, 75 deputy neutrons and 11 assistant deputy neutrons, giving it an atomic mass of 312. These 312 particles are held together by forces called morons, which are surrounded by vast quantities of lepton-like particles called peons.

Since governmentium has no electrons, it is inert. However, it can be detected as it impedes every reaction with which it comes into contact. A minute amount of governmentium causes one reaction to take over 4 days to complete when it would normally take less than a second. Governmentium has a normal half-life of 1 to 6 years; it does not decay, but instead undergoes a reorganization in which a portion of the assistant neutrons and deputy neutrons exchange places. In fact, governmentium's mass will actually in crease over time, since reorganization causes some morons to become neutrons, forming isodopes.

This characteristic of moron-promotion leads some scientists to speculate that governmentium is formed whenever morons reach a certain quantity in concentration. This hypothetical quantity is referred to as "Critical Morass." You will know it when you see it!

Listening to the arguments on gay marriage

Published on Thursday, February 5, 2004 By Brad Wardell In Personal Relationships

The United States is premised on the separation of church and state. But over time, what that separation means has changed.  The founding fathers wanted to ensure that people were free to practice whatever religion they wanted. Moreover, they wanted to ensure that the government did not establish any official religion. You will regularly hear the ACLU refer to the "establishment clause" of the US constitution as the basis for their various lawsuits against states.

It's a sticky situation because for such a long while, the percentage of Americans who were Christians were so high that religious concepts made their way into government policy. This wasn't intentional in most cases. If you're a true believer many things that are religious in nature just seem natural, common sense, normal. One such thing is marriage.

In hindsight, it was probably a bad idea for the government to recognize marriage as anything beyond a civil union. But it's easy to understand why this happened. Marriage is such a normal part of human life that how could the government not recognize it?  As an agnostic, it's never bothered me either way. I am comfortable with my beliefs and do not feel threatened by people's religions. In fact, I embrace their beliefs because it helps create a deep tapestry of culture that enriches us all.

I also believe in two social principles: 1) That the traditions of the super-majority should be respected and protected. 2) The rights of the minority should be protected.

I think government should get out of the marriage business entirely. I support the right of any two people to "get married" regardless of sex.  However, the super majority don't think the government should recognize these unions. And by our constitution, that's pretty much that. Marriage isn't a "right". The 10th amendment makes pretty clear that anything not explicitly outlined in the constitution is left to "the people" (in the form of their democratically elected representatives).

That said, gays should have access to civil unions that have the same legal punch as marriage. It may seem like semantics but to millions of Americans, it's not. There is a principle involved here. The same people who argued that the Super Bowl nonsense with Janet Jackson was "no big deal" are likely to not see why people object to gay marriage. The majority of Americans believe in these traditions and they have been with us for literally thousands of years. All around us, however, small minorities seem bent on using the government to infringe on those traditions.  Marriage is a cultural phenomenon, not a religious one. And as long as the majority of Americans practicing it believe it should be between a man and a women exclusively that is what it should be. It's their tradition. Contrary to what some may believe, majorities have rights too.

The government should work to ensure that civil unions have the same legal meaning as marriages. Two consenting adults, regardless of sex, should have the right to form a legal union.  For that matter, I believe that any number of consenting adults should be able to form civil unions (whether you're into "Polyamory" or whatever). But marriage should not be open for redefinition by a small minority of people. And they should not be trying to use the tools of government to hijack it for their own uses.