I hate doing demos. There, I've said it.

The reason I hate it is that you usually have to pick between a demo that people like and a demo that actually sells the game.  It's tough to find that balance.

The best game demo we ever did was The Corporate Machine. In that demo, it was fully playable but you had to play on-line against other people. It was great because people got to see what the game was like and played people on-line.  Of course, it required them to find people on-line which was a little inconvenient at times but it worked out pretty well.

So now that I've poo-pooed making the demo. I do think it's a good demo.

Here's what it consists of:

• Players play as humans
• Galaxy size set to small galaxy
• 3 opponents
• 150 turns (probably enough to finish the game).

Otherwise players can go nuts with it. It should be enough to show off the game and see what they can expect while not giving away so much that there's no reason to get the full game.

It goes into QA tomorrow and will probably be in there for a week or two.

Galactic Civilizations II: Dread Lords v1.1 is in development.  We've got a lot of new features planned.  The list below is by no means comprehensive. It's just some of the things we're focusing on:

• The ability to set a given planet as a technology, research, ship building or balanced planet, . NOT like the overall focus. It would literally add a 9% boost to a given type (or 3%, 3%, 3%).
• Color coded the hammers/etc. based on whether they are bonus or not. Then on mouse over, which by then should be very nice, we can display where these numbers come from.
• On game setup, have an option to simply set up how many players you want to play against and have it randomly pick who you’re playing with.
• On game setup, have a checkbox that says "Randomize intelligence". The result would be that the game difficulty would be used to distribute the intelligence points. Example: I could select "Tough" and then have this checkbox selected and it would look at the # of players and the total number of intelligent points it takes to have tough and then distribute it out so that some are smarter than others (up to a 30% difference between intelligences).
• Lots of tweaks to the context window UIs which we’ll be discussing how best to do it.
• Fleet Manager screen.
• An option to show auto pilot ships destinations on map with a very very faint line (dotted preferably if possible) where they are going. Ala the trade routes.
• When selecting a constructor, have a very very faint circle that shows the area of effect a starbase would have.
• MAJORLY updated AI (not to make it tougher, to make it smarter at higher levels and dumber -- i.e. poor strategies -- at lower levels)
• Additional ship extras for more ship options
• Bug fixes of various kinds
• Approval Rating > 75% gives you a 5% boost to production. Approval rating < 40% has a -5% affect on production. Players won't be charged for this bonus production.
• Ability to rotate ship components in the Ship Designer
• Dynamic logo components - brand your ships with your insignia
• Enhanced context menus for managing stacked ships and fleets
• Starbase modules pruned/tweaked
• Unused Social Spending routed to military spending (or back to treasury if nothing is being used)
• New ship components
• UI for selecting MODS/Total Conversions
• Updated Scoring System
• No Tech Trading option
• New maps and scenarios
• Various tweaks to economics, costs, etc.

Update: Free-form ship component rotation and resizing after being placed added. Very cool in action!

We expect to have this out by the end of the month. It'll be free for all customers of Galactic Civilizations II -- now at a store near you.

The auto-track back system our IT guys developed certainly got a work out over the weekend with the copy protection news item. 

We received email from StarForce today apologizing for the incident. We appreciated them taking down the link.  It also gave us the opportunity to request the various meta-torrent sites to remove links to illegal torrents.

In every case, the torrent list site in question responded quickly to our request.  One might make the argument that a simple polite email to a meta-torrent search site is as effective as copy protection.

There is probably some irony that this whole thing occurred just before last week's EBGames.com top selling games list got posted on their site. They list Galactic Civilizations II as the top telling PC title and the #2 overall (all platforms).  And that was before this incident.

I don't want us to come out like we're on some sort of anti-copy protection crusade. We just don't think CD copy protection is an effective means to increase sales.

Here's the basic question that every publisher/gamer/developer could ask:  By requiring the CD to be in the drive to play a game, even assuming that protection unbreakable, do you increase your sales?

I ask that because many gamers who are on the fence on a given title won't purchase a game if it requires them to treat their CD like a dongle key. Why? Because let's face it, we lose our CDs eventually. Or we damage them. And so what happens is that people who are on the fence on a given title simply choose not to buy the game.

By not having any CD copy protection, people who are on the fence about our game can see that it's only $40 and once it's installed on their machines (plural) they don't have to fuss with the CD anymore. And we do have a type of copy protection -- free updates for customers. Tomorrow we'll be posting the v1.1 feature list based on your suggestions.

So which method gains the most sales? There's no definitive answer for that.  I think a given game's demographics have a lot to do with piracy rates in the first place. 

Meanwhile, Gamespot followed-up the issue. I spoke to them briefly today on the issue. You can see that in the link below.

I think the most effective way of increasing sales is probably to make games people want to buy. But I'm an engineer, not a marketer so what do I know?

While many of us are working on Galactic Civilizations II in order to deliver new updates, the rest of our game team is working on our other major game title, Society.

Society is a massively multiplayer RTS. But it's not an RTS in the sense most people think of it -- warfare is not what people will spend most of their time doing.  Most of the time is spent building their society -- constructing buildings, researching the endless technology tree (it's a persistent world so that tech tree goes on forever), helping their Socians live out their lives, trading with neigbhors.  Oh, don't get me wrong, there's definitely war. It's just not that common.

If you thought the ship design stuff in GalCiv II is cool, wait till you see what you'll be doing in Society. Virtually everything can optionally be designed by the users (see screenshot).

To get the latest news on it, head over to www.societygame.com.

Things continue to move forward on Society.  We're still a long...long way for having anything that is ready to ship.  As a recap, Society is a massively multiplayer real-time strategy game. Unlike the typical RTS, warfare is the exception -- it is just diplomacy by other means.  Most of the player's time is spent building their societies.  That means designing their cities, providing for their people, developing a culture, dealing with the royal family, trading with neighbors, etc.  Warfare is definitely an element  But Society isn't about raising masses of troops for constant warfare. Such game mechanics would fall apart in a persistent universe game. After all, you don't want to wake up and have your empire destroyed during the night. Your skill will effect how powerful your society is overall.

There are many game mechanics we're still playing around with.  Weather (as the screenshot demonstrates) on a global scale. Should the weather be real? That is, based on the server location? Or it should it be random? Should your population of Socians be large or small?  Right now, we're increasingly inclined to have populations be fairly small (maybe a hundred people per province).  That way, you can get to know each and every citizen of your Society if you want -- from the moment they're born, their childhood all the way until you send them off to war to get killed. And who do you sent off the war? How egalitarian do you want to be? Are you going to send your best and brightest? Your wealthiest? Every Socian is unique, some produce more than others in different areas.

What about your cities? How do you want them to be? If you think the ship design features in Galactic Civilizations II were neat, wait till you see how much you can do in the user-designed buildings (see screenshot).

So when will this thing come out? A lot of that depends on how many people we can get on the team. We are looking for game developers, .NET developers, artists, you name it.  Send your resume to [email protected] with the subject "Game Developer".  We're located in Plymouth Michigan (no external team members on this project, we need everyone in-house for this).  But if all goes well, we should have a workable build  late this year or early next year. So it's still a ways off. We fully expect to have a year-long public beta.  There's no other MMO to model this after so we are going to need to be very careful about how to best roll it out there.

As some people know, you can already mod Galactic Civilizations II quite heavily.  We have a basic modding guide already up.  The coolest mods are going probably going to involve the ship stuff.  I've already seen people putting in high-polygon models that look really cool.  All you have to do is load up Maya or 3D Studio, make your ship model or part or whatever and export it as a .X.  Hard points are just dummy nodes that we did with 3D Studio.  There's no polygon limit so you can go nuts.   Then in the \data\english\gc2types.xml file you just put in your own stuff.

Of course, when it comes to sharing your mods we need something more robust.  So this is a preview of what should be part of v1.1.  We want to explicitly support total conversion mods easily.

Directory Structure

1.1 will create a \Mods folder on install and provide an example mod that we'll make.  The Mods folder is essentially a mirror of the GalCiv2 directory. For example:

\GalCiv2\Mods\Babylon5\data\English

\GalCiv2\Mods\Babylon5\gfx

\GalCIv2\Mods\Babylon5\Screens

and so forth. 

In the root of the actual mod folder (using Babylon5 as an example since JMS has tended to be more supportive of mods and fan content over the years) you would have a mod.xml file that will provide a description of the mod and various notices/permissions that the mod author may have needed to obtain.

There will also be a \Generic directory which will simply be a catch-all for all the mods you get from here and elsewhere. You can just dump your stuff in that directory and the game will use it.  The game won't care about the file names of the XML files. It will only be looking at the key names in the XML files.

User Interface

In the Games Options window, there will be a Mods button that when pressed will bring up a dialog asking you which set of mods you want to use.  Based on what you select, it'll add those ships, screens, data, etc. in and replace the included ones when applicable.

We hope to have v1.1 out by either the end of this month or early next month. We're currently working on getting the demo out the door.

Mods will be available in the library section, though be aware that we're clamping down on copyrighted material. Don't upload to us other people's work unless you have permission.

There's been a lot of discussion about a lot of stuff -- marketing, copy protection, you name it.  But I think that's all out the window at this point.  Word of mouth rules.

Publishers everywhere are going to have to take notice that word of mouth trumps everything else.  Be good to your customers. Make games they want, deliver on your promises.

You guys just rock! We are so glad you like our game.  And we are so excited about all the cool ideas, mods, suggestions, and other things that you guys are coming up with. 

Normally the release of a game is the end of the story other than "patches" to fix bugs.  But not this time. Not with this game.  Your retail game is just the beginning. 

If the site weren't getting so hammered, and I apologize that our forums are so pathetically slow, they were designed with GalCiv1 X 2.5 levels of traffic.  Today, GalCiv2.com was ranked in the top 3,000 websites worldwide.  So the forums are tkaing a beating.  But anyway, as soon as the traffic from the Starforce bruhaha dies down, we'll have the 1.1 specs up.  We think you'll like what you see.

Thanks again for supporting us! We hope to return that support to you many times over!

Sorry guys that the site has been flakey. 

We set up GalCiv2.com to make use of the same database network that WinCustomize has because traditionally, game sites don't get a lot of traffic.  However, the game has done far better than we had anticipated (and we were anticipating it would do pretty well).  This in turn has increased traffic there far beyond what we had spec'd.  Moreover, over this weekend we had a situation that caused Slashdot, Digg, Neowin, Metafilter, and literally over 200 other sites to link to a particular article.

We have new servers on order. One of which is just a total monster. I wish I could have it. Both Raid 1 and Raid 0 on it! SMP 64-bit Dual core. So it should help things.  But in the meantime, we're limping along.  The current infrastructure was not designed to handle two sites of WinCustomize's traffic levels.

Update: The new servers have arrived. Now we just have to configure them, load them up, and get them up.  They're real monsters!

Some more reviews of Galactic Civilizations II have arrived.

GamePlasma's review is up.

They sum up with the question:

I can only think of one last question to ask "Is it better then Civilization 4?" In my opinion it’s a dead heat based on you’re preference to dominate space or to dominate the planet.

GameDaily has their review of Galactic Civilizations II up as well.

Their summary:

This empire-building strategy encompasses everything that makes the genre great. If you are looking for a game that falls in the same vein as the Civilization and Master of Orion series, and absolutely bursting with content, this is the game to get. Galactic Civilizations II: Dread Lords is great technologically and also in gameplay.

More to come...

Well, today GalCiv2.com got both slashdotted, Digged, and Neowin'ed at the same time.

Why? It started earlier today.  Someone over at Digg.com made an article that implied that Stardock wanted people to pirate our game, Galactic Civilizations II.  Which is definitely not true.  We need every sale we can get.

But the argument was essentially that because our retail game has no copy protection that we essentially invite piracy. And since sales of the game have been so good, that piracy somehow "helped" the game.  I doubt that very much.  I think sales have been strong because of positive word of mouth of people who bought the game in the first place.

Meanwhile, someone over at Starforce's site made a point of telling them how well GalCiv II has done.  At that point, the admin of the Starforce forums did something...something I am still stunned about.  They put up a working URL to a site that was listing illegal torrents of our game to "prove" how much it's being pirated (wow, there's piracy? Gee, no kidding, thanks for directing all the people who didn't know about it to that link -- even I didn't know about it).

When I responded to the Digg article, I included this annoying fact that Starforce had linked to a site listing warez of our game.

This in turn caught the attention of a lot of people. What on Earth was Starforce's people thinking linking to a site with links to Warez copies?  Especially given that Starforce is one of the leading makers of anti-piracy software. I don't know what their motives are and I won't speculate. But we were deeply troubled by it.

When our guys started hearing about this yesterday afternoon, I asked them to contact both Starforce and the site they linked to and politely ask them to remove the links.  Starforce didn't remove the URL until tonight -- only after it got Slashdotted.  The site they linked to removed it and all other Stardock warez links in their list (they're a search site, they don't host the stuff) that could be found and did so within a few hours.

I don't want to make it out that I'm some sort of kumbaya guy. Piracy is a problem and it does cost sales. I just don't think it's as big of a problem as the game industry thinks it is.  I also don't think inconveniencing customers is the solution.

What we do with GalCiv II is pretty straight forward -- we include unique serial #s with each game. Those serial #s are then used to get updates. Our server knows which serials are out there and can send up a flag if, for instance, it's being used 100 times a week in 100 different locations.  It's a system that works very well and is largely invisible to users and still allows them to install the game on their laptop, their desktop, their work machine, their backup machine at home, etc. without being hassled.

The idea being that we win people over through providing better service through free updates with meaningful new featuers after release. 

But it doesn't mean we're naive about piracy.  We just think it's a) overstated and that CD copy protection isn't the best solution in many/most cases. 

Update: This is why JoeUser.com's availability (and WinCustomize's) has been spotty.  New, fast servers are on order so we should be in better shape soon.