Brad Wardell's Blog


The battle between Microsoft and Google continues to heat up

Published on Tuesday, September 6, 2005 By Brad Wardell In WinCustomize News

According to a Betanews story, Microsoft's Steve Ballmer was furious when he learned that Kai-Fu Lee was leaving Microsoft for Google.  According to one witness, Ballmer vowed to "bury" Google.  Ballmer denies that the incident occurred as described.

Editorial:

Whether true or not, if a competitor were hiring my guys, I'd probably say more aggressive things than "bury".  At the level Microsoft and Google are, we should leave the comparisons with companies behind and look at them more like sports teams. I suspect the Cowboys and Steelers have had tougher words than "bury" in the past.

But no matter how you look at it, the battle is on between Microsoft and Google.  And to think only a couple years ago there were rumors of Microsoft buying Google.

Owens Corning Basement System Experiences

Published on Tuesday, September 6, 2005 By Brad Wardell In Home Improvement

Back in 2003, I had my basement finished using the Owens Corning Basement System.  It's an alternative to dry-wall that looks similar to dry-wall but is actually soft to the touch (that is, it is almost like a cushion).

The advantages of Owens Corning's system to normal dry-wall (According to Owens Corning) include:

  • Basements can be finished much quicker.  The 1200 square foot or so of our basement that we got finished was done in about 10 days (compared to months with dry-wall).
  • It is very damage resistant -- it doesn't scratch, it looks the same 2 years after the fact.
  • It is allegedly black mold resistant.  Drywall, being made of wood, can serve as a place for mold to grow.  Owens Corning's system is synthetic, nothing grows.
  • It's water damage resistant -- you can get it wet and it looks fine once it dries.
  • It acts as a great sound proofing mechanism.  The basement is quiet.
  • It has good acoustics. Great for home theaters and such.

It also has down sides:

  • It's quite expensive. Significantly more-so than Dry Wall.
  • The sales people who sell it use an obnoxious hard sell technique that is, IMO, borderline unethical.
  • It is hard to modify. That is, you want put shelves or "nail" things to the wall, you really can't, you have to do it with special fasteners since the wall isn't made of wood, it doesn't support other structures being placed on it well.
  • You're tied into Owens Corning for repairs, modifications, etc.
  • Bears repeating - the sales people who sell it use rather unsavory sales tactics in which if you don't actually bargain them down you could pay 2X as much as you really should.

My original review can be found here.  Since it was the first review on a major site, it has over 150 different websites pointing to it. 20,000 people alone have visited because it shows up high in Google's search engine.  But it also means that there's hundreds of comments which can be hard to go through.

So I've established this running article as a way for people to post their experiences with Owens Corning Basement System. 

My overall experience has been positive. But since I run a company and deal with aggressive sales people all the time, I didn't have a problem neutralizing their sales techniques.  But they are unusually aggressive (note that these sales people rarely work for Owens Corning directly, they work for other companies who sell it).  And our experience was mildly soured by attempts to nickel and dime us at the end. 

But overall, 2 years later, I'm pretty happy with it and am glad we went with it. I do sometimes get jealous of my neighbors who did a true "full finish" basement that looks like their upstairs.  But then I remind myself that it took them 6 months to do that whereas mine was done in 10 days without any mess or fuss.  It's not for everyone but for us, it worked out pretty well.

Please feel free to share your experiences in the comments area and I will try to post some of them here from time to time.

To moderate or not to moderate

Published on Monday, September 5, 2005 By Brad Wardell In Living in Cyberspace

I'm a moderator on many different websites and each site has its own rules of conduct not just for users, but for moderators as well.

On WinCustomize.com, moderators are encouraged to moderate politely but publicly.  If a user is acting out, a moderator is supposed to make his presence felt so that observers can see that "the cops are on the beat".

On other sites, moderation is done discretely. If someone is misbehaving, a private message is sent to them letting them know they must stop or they face punishment.  To users on the forums, the moderator's presence is almost invisible. This way, so goes the theory, the forum participants don't feel like big brother is watching.

Which begs the question, which way do you think is more effective?

No Need to Click Here - I'm just claiming my feed at Feedster feedster:99fa96d97dd67dbadc2839937ce79167

WGF finally branded as DirectX 10

Published on Sunday, September 4, 2005 By Brad Wardell In WinCustomize News

Microsoft had been referring to their next generation graphics API as "Windows Graphic Foundation" (WGF).  But in a moment of sanity, Microsoft has finally decided to rebrand it as DirectX 10.

It gave some details to the developers officially about its upcoming API and we know that it plans to release this API together with Longhorn. Or Vista, as we must learn to call it.

The DirectX 10 API will have completely new and faster dynamic link libraries (DLLs) and is supposed to run much faster. The company decided to cut the backward compatibility with DirectX 9, 8, 7 and lower in this API but there will be a way to use games programmed for those APIs. Microsoft will enable support for DX 9 or lower games through a software layer, meaning it might run slower.

The company did this to make the next API faster, it said, and at the same time will take some burden of the CPU runtime. At the same time we learned that DirectX 10 will have support for Shaders beyond Shaders, model 4.0.

It's coming with Longhorn but we learned that Shader Model 4.0 might come even before Vista.

Gamespot previews Galactic Civilizations II

Published on Saturday, September 3, 2005 By Brad Wardell In WinCustomize News

Gamespot has a preview of Stardock's upcoming PC strategy game, Galactic Civilizations II: Dread Lords.  It's the sequel to the award-winning, best selling strategy game of the same title (Galactic Civilizations) released in 2003.  In Galactic Civilizations II, players take on the role of leader of an interstellar civilization (play as leader of humanity or one of 9 other alien races). 

For WinCustomize users, what you may find interesting is that the entire user interface is created with DesktopX. That is, the screens directory is literally dozens of .dxpacks.  To make use of DesktopX in a state-of-the art PC strategy game, a DirectX 9 based 3D engine was developed that then reads in the DXPacks and uses them that way.  For players, this means that they can "skin" the game itself simply by loading up the .dxpacks and moving them around.  The UI graphics are being done by Stardock's Paul Boyer (Mormegil).

The preview includes many screenshots in which you can see the UI in action as well as the game-play.  The final game won't be out until early next year.

VIEW: [Gamespot Preview]

Gamespot Preview of Galactic Civilizations II

Published on Saturday, September 3, 2005 By Brad Wardell In GalCiv II News

Gamespot has a preview of Galactic Civilizations II up and going.  Definitely worth checking out!

NOTE: This is a hands on preview with lots of brand new screenshots. I.e. they played beta 3.

Early verdict: Combining the best elements of Galactic Civilizations & Master or Orion 2.

Making WinCustomize subscriptions better...

Published on Saturday, September 3, 2005 By Brad Wardell In WinCustomize News

Whether you're a current subscriber or not, what features of a subscription would make you more likely to subscribe?

WinCustomize subscriptions are currently $19.95 which last 1 year.  After that year, a user can renew for $19.95 which provides 2 additional years.

Subscriptions currently provide:

  • Access to the WinCustomize Premium Browser (program that is a front end to the overall site)
  • Two premium suites
  • Personal Pages (http://frogboy.wincustomize.com).
  • Personal Photo album storage
  • No advertismenets
  • Unlimited use of download bandwidth
  • Access to faster servers

What would be some good additions/changes to this do you think?

 

It's not the car you drive, it's the gallons you burn

Published on Saturday, September 3, 2005 By Brad Wardell In Politics

I cringe everytime I hear people yell about SUVs and their gas mileage. I was talking to a friend of mine in California who made some pretty...militant remarks about people who drive SUVs and their irresponsible behavior.  To which I said, "Wait, don't you commute an hour per day to work?" To which he said, "Well sure, but I drive a Toyota Corolla."  So what?

I don't care what kind of car you're driving, if you're driving over an hour (total) per day, you're burning a lot of gas. Some people have to drive that far and other people simply prefer to live out in the country.  And I have no problem with that.  But if you do live far away from work (or in the case of my friend simply have to drive through heavy traffic for long periods of time) then you can't go around condemning other people's car choices.

I don't have an SUV.  But I do have a car that only gets 18 miles to the gallon.  I also drive 6 miles to work and 6 miles home.  I spend about 20 minutes per day on the road -- total. 

The Corolla gets around 35MPG on average if you're driving it mostly in the city.  My friend drives about 25 miles each way, 50 miles per day.  So he burns 1.43 gallons of gas per day.  I burn 0.67 gallons of gas per day. Over the course of the year, he uses over 500 gallons of gas.  I use 243 gallons of gas -- less than half as much.

I don't care what kind of car other people drive.  But if you're going to take on a holier-than-thou attitude on fuel standards, then you better be factoring in your commute distance.